바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Improved Method for Considering Citation Measures in Evaluating Korean Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2020, v.37 no.1, pp.197-220
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.197
Jae Yun Lee (memexlee@mju.ac.kr)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Recently, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) announced new plan to reflect the KCI citation measures in journal evaluation. In principle, Journal evaluation should reflect each journals situation and characteristics through various indicators. In this study, three improvement plans were proposed by reviewing the announced journal evaluation plan of NRF. The first improvement is to consider the five-year IF as an additional citation measure; the second improvement is to allow flexible selection of the category level on which to rank journals; and the last improvement is to combine the previous two methods and apply them together. The improvement methods proposed in this study are expected to contribute to minimizing side effects of KCI journal evaluation.

keywords
학술지평가, 인용지수, 영향력지수, 한국학술지인용색인, KCI, journal evaluation, citation measures, impact factor, Korean Citation Index, KCI
Submission Date
2020-03-05
Revised Date
2020-03-10
Accepted Date
2020-03-10

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management