A Study on Legal Commentary Information Services Based on the Usage Patterns of Legal Information Sources

Jong, S. W. , & Jee, Y. L. (2020). A Study on Legal Commentary Information Services Based on the Usage Patterns of Legal Information Sources. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(1), 127-151, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.127

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

The court has the responsibility to determine the final interpretation of the law. The court hands down final decisions on personal disputes and conflicts between individuals and the state. Legal commentaries will stay true to their intention of providing diverse legal theories and enabling a unified legal interpretation only when law practitioners are allowed to discuss in depth laws, cases, and legal theories within the boundaries set by commentary authors. If law practitioners include the latest laws, cases, and legal theories as well as their opinions to existing commentaries in their judicial roles and legal studies, they will be able to obtain a unified legal interpretation without referring to other legal literature.

keywords: 주석, 주해, 주석서, 법률가, 정보추구행태, 정보요구, 집단지성, 법률정보원, 법률정보 서비스, 법률해석, commentary, annotation, legal commentary, law practitioner, information seeking behavior, information needs, collective intelligence, legal information sources, legal information service, legal interpretation

Submission Date: 2020-02-25

Revised Date: 2020-03-02

Accepted Date: 2020-03-21

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.37 No.1

A Study on Legal Commentary Information Services Based on the Usage Patterns of Legal Information Sources

Abstract

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management