바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.3
Citation Share

Generational Comparative Analysis on Library Usage of Senior Groups in National Assembly Library of Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2018, v.35 no.3, pp.287-309
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.3.287


& (2018). Generational Comparative Analysis on Library Usage of Senior Groups in National Assembly Library of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(3), 287-309, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.3.287
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

As coming Senior-Shift age, senior users are regarded as one of the importance user groups in the library. This study is to find the usage patterns and needs of libraries and digital libraries by 152 seniors and to compare with young-old age (baby boom generation) and elderly age. As a result, total seniors visited regularly and preferred political & social, religion & philosophy, and history & geography. While the baby boom generation are using the economy & finance, art & culture compared to the older. And the baby boom generation visit for self-development and the older visit for leisure purposes. Secondly, If the search fails, the baby boomers control the results themselves, while the older is more turn to the librarians. It can be described as the need for a librarian exclusively responsible for the senior. Thirdly, senior have difficulties in access and use of search aided tools or functions. Therefore, this study suggested that it is necessary to build an intuitive interface using the help and menu descriptions for senior who have poor access to convenience and define functions.

keywords
senior, active senior, baby boom generation, digital library, interface, use pattern, user behavior, National Assembly Library, 시니어, 액티브시니어, 베이비붐세대, 전자도서관, 인터페이스, 이용패턴, 이용행태, 국회도서관

Reference

1.

강소영. (2015). 노인광고콘텐츠의 의미 변화 분석: TV 광고를 중심으로.

2.

교보생명. (2014). 대한민국 시니어 리포트 2014. 교보생명.

3.

김미혜. (2015). 한국 베이비부머의 삶과 미래:학지사.

4.

김보일. (2017). LibQUAL+를 적용한 공공도서관 노인 서비스 품질 평가에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(1), 319-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.319.

5.

김선호. (2002). 공공 도서관의 노인 서비스 정책에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 33(4), -.

6.

김선호. (2003). 공공도서관의 노인용 인터페이스 디자인에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 34(3), 111-124.

7.

김은지. (2014). 공공도서관 노인 서비스를 위한 제언. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(2), 59-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.2.059.

8.

김희섭. (2014). 대학생층과 비교를 통한 고령층의 모바일기반 정보행위 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 45(1), 249-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.249.

9.

나경식. (2017). 건강정보검색에서 노인이 경험하는 어려움과 감정변화. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(1), 227-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.227.

10.

도서관정보정책위원회. (2014). 제2차 도서관발전 종합계획: 2014∼2018. 대통령소속 도서관정보정책위원회.

11.

문화체육관광부. (2017). 국민 독서실태 조사: 2017. 문화체육관광부.

12.

박옥화. (2007). 공공도서관 고령 이용자에 대한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(1), 375-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.1.200703.375.

13.

백용운. (2016). 노년학 개론:공동체.

14.

백찬규. (2017). 젊은 노인의 탄생:원앤원북스.

15.

송지인. (2008). 공공도서관에서의 노인 이용자 서비스 방안에 관한 연구 : 서울시 구/공립 도서관을 대상으로.

16.

오선혜. (2012). 공공도서관 시니어 이용자의 도서관불안에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(1), 257-276.

17.

윤정옥. (2013). 공공도서관 노인 대상 정보서비스에 관한 연구. 인문과학논집, 47, 161-182.

18.

윤정옥. (2012). 정보취약계층의 정의와 속성에 관한 고찰. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(4), 189-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.189.

19.

윤혜영. (2017). 노인의 정보격차 해소를 위한 도서관 정책수립의 고려사항. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 48(4), 77-105.

20.

윤희윤. (2012). 공공도서관의 지식정보 취약계층서비스 전략. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 43(2), 53-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.2.201206.53.

21.

이하얀. (2018). 공공도서관 노인사회참여 프로그램 효과에 관한 연구.

22.

한국방송광고진흥공사. (2015). 소비자행태조사 보고서. 한국방송광고진흥공사.

23.

堀薫夫. 高齢者向けの図書館サービス.

24.

增田宗昭. (2015). 지적자본론:민음사.

25.

宇陀則彦. (2018). 図書館における高齢者の資料選択理由の分析. 図書館情報メディア研究, 15(2), 17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.15068/00151144.

26.

呑海沙織. (2017). 超高齢社会と図書館. 図書館界, 69(1), 3-11.

27.

Renee Bennett-Kapusniak. (2013). Older Adults and the Public Library: The Impact of the Boomer Generation. Public Library Quarterly, 32(3), 204-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2013.818814.

28.

Mary F. Cavanagh. (2012). Baby boomers, their elders and the public library. Library Review, 61(8/9), 622-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531211292114.

29.

Deborah H. Charbonneau. (2014). Public Library Websites and Adherence to Senior-Friendly Guidelines. Public Library Quarterly, 33(2), 121-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2014.910722.

30.

Emy Nelson Decker. (2010). Baby Boomers and the United States public library system. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 605-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096268.

31.

Edmondson, Ricca. (2015). Ageing, insight, and wisdom: meaning and practice:Policy press.

32.

Cynthia Hughes. (2017). Rural Libraries Services for Older Adults: A Nationwide Survey. Public Library Quarterly, 36(1), 43-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1275626.

33.

Joseph, Mylee. (2009). Public library strategies for the over 50s: Everything old is new again - or is it?. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 22(3), 115-119.

34.

Kelly Myer Polacek. (2012). “Boomer-ize” Your Library Collection. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 52(2), 102-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n2.102.

35.

Park, Mi Hyang. (2010). Information seeking behaviors of the baby-boomers in Korean public sectors as pre-retirees.

36.

Claudia A. Perry. (2014). Information Services to Older Adults: Initial Findings from a Survey of Suburban Libraries. The Library Quarterly, 84(3), 348-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676491.

37.

Pannaga Prasad. (2009). Reference Services to Senior Groups in the San Antonio Public Library. The Reference Librarian, 50(1), 99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763870802546456.

38.

UN. (2009). World population ageing 2009. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPA2009/WPA2009_WorkingPaper.pdf.

39.

WHO. (2001). Indicators for the minimum data set project on ageing: A critical review in sub-Saharan Africa. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageing_mds_report_en_daressalaam.pdf.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy