바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.1
Citation Share

An Analysis of Korean University Library Holdings of Western Language Books Using a Union Catalog Database

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2018, v.35 no.1, pp.205-229
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.205


& (2018). An Analysis of Korean University Library Holdings of Western Language Books Using a Union Catalog Database. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(1), 205-229, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.1.205
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study analyzed Korean university libraries’ holdings of Western language books published in 2003 and 2013 using the KERIS union catalog with a view to investigating the changes in collection development of Western language books in the libraries. To do that, new collection indexes - holding h-index, CUI (Collection Uniqueness Index), and CCHR (Common Collection Holding Ratio) - were suggested, and they were used with basic indexes such as the number of titles, the number of books, and the number of books per title. The analysis reveals that compared to those published in 2003, the number of titles was decreased by 16.1% with those published in 2013, and the number of books dropped more sharply, by 42.2%. Also, in 2013, CCHR was decreased while CUI was increased. In terms of subject, among DDC main classes, 0XX (Generalities) showed the greatest decrease rate in both the number of titles and books because of the radical reduction of computer-related books. In terms of each library’s holdings, the number of Western language books held by top libraries has been increased with those published in 2013.

keywords
종합목록, 장서 개발, 장서 평가, 소장 h-지수, 공통장서 확보율, 장서 고유성 지수, union catalog, collection development, collection evaluation, KERIS, holding h-index, common collection holding ratio, collection uniqueness index

Reference

1.

김선애. (2006). KOLIS-NET 종합목록 DB의 품질평가. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1), 95-117.

2.

오지은. (2015). 공공도서관의 장서개발정책 수립을 위한 장서평가 지표에 관한 탐색적 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(1), 43-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.043.

3.

윤지은. (2014). 자료구입비 감소로 학술도서 비중도 줄고 있다. http://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=29893.

4.

Jae-Whoan Lee. (2002). Quality Evaluation and Management of a Shared Cataloging DB: the Case of KERIS UNICAT DB. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1), 61-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.1.061.

5.

Sun-Yeong Cho. (2002). A Study on Error Data Types in the KERIS Union Catalog - Focused on Dissertation Bibliographic Database -. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(4), 5-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.4.005.

6.

조재인. (2015). 대학도서관의 종합목록 기여 활동 및 이용 정도에 대한 탐사적 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 26(1), 35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.1.035.

7.

(2018). KERIS 종합목록 홈페이지. http://unicat.riss.kr.

8.

Jennifer Benedetto Beals. (2007). Assessing collections using brief tests and WorldCat Collection Analysis. Collection Building, 26(4), 104-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01604950710831898.

9.

J. E. Hirsch. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

10.

David E. Hubbard. (2012). Benchmarking mechanical engineering collections using the WorldCat Collection Analysis tool. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 36(3-4), 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2012.09.001.

11.

Albert H. Joy. (2010). The OCLC/AMIGOS Collection Analysis CD. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 8(1), 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J121v08n01_03.

12.

Anna H. Perrault. (1994). The shrinking national collection. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 18(1), 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0364-6408(94)90067-1.

13.

Anna H. Perrault. (1999). National collecting trends: Collection analysis methods and findings. Library & Information Science Research, 21(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80005-X.

14.

Wilen, R.. (2006). Collection evaluation: Micro and macro levels - Preliminary guidelines and the results of a pilot study of two Finnish university libraries. Signum, 3, 39-43.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy