바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Characteristics of Open Access in Korean Scholarly Journals: Focused on KCI Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2017, v.34 no.3, pp.251-267
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.251


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze open access features of 1,890 Korean scientific journals registered in the Korea Citation Index (KCI). To this end, this study classified open access features of the target scientific journals into two main aspects, free access and free redistribution. The analysis results indicated that the target scientific journals had strong free access aspects. Based on websites, 67% of the target scientific journals allowed for free access without a login process and based on free database, 48% provided free access. On the other hand, the target scientific journals had weaker free redistribution aspects compared to their free access aspects. Only 14% of them offered the CC (creative commons) license. Another finding was that there were clear differences in open access aspects by academic field. Medicine, pharmacy, natural science, agriculture, fisheries, oceanography, and engineering had stronger open access aspects than humanities, sociology, arts, physical education, and interdisciplinary science. It appears that the difference was caused by the presence or absence of organizations supporting distribution of scientific journals of the fields concerned. To narrow the gap, it is recommended that the open access governance system is established to set up open access policies for Korean scientific journals regardless of academic fields and to support them.

keywords
오픈액세스, 오픈액세스 학술지, KCI 등재지, 무료접근, 재사용성, open access, OA journals, KCI journals, free of charge, free of copyright

Reference

1.

김규환. (2014). 국내 학회의 오픈액세스 수용과 추진방식에 대한 제안. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 111-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.111.

2.

정경희. (2011). 국내 오픈액세스 학술지 특성에 관한 연구 - KCI 등재지를 중심으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(3), 373-391.

3.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.

4.

Dehua Hu. (2012). Open Access Journals in China: The Current Situation and Development Strategies. Serials Review, 38(2), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2012.03.001.

5.

Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/.

6.

Finch Group. (2015). Monitoring the transition to open access: A report for the universities UK open access co-ordination group. https://www.acu.ac.uk/research-information-network/monitoring-transition-to-open-access.

7.
8.

David Kramer. (2017). Steady, strong growth is expected for open-access journals. Physics Today, 70(5), 24-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3550.

9.
10.

Public Knowledge Project. https://pkp.sfu.ca/.

11.

Rosângela Rodrigues. (2016). Research Articles about Open Access Indexed by Scopus: A Content Analysis. Publications, 4(4), 31-. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications4040031.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management