바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

초록의 구조와 내용에 관한 연구: 정보관리학회지를 중심으로

A Study on the Structure and Content of Abstracts: Focused on Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.3, pp.107-131
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.107
장우권 (전남대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 연구는 정보관리학회지의 초록의 현황에 대한 조사와 분석을 통해 초록의 특징을 진단하고자 한다. 이를 위해 학회지의 저자초록을 중심으로 초록의 구성요소, 초록의 유형 등을 분석하였다. 대상초록은 1984년부터 2015년까지 간행된 학회지 논문이다. 그 결과 수록논문은 1,168편, 지시적 초록은 96.6%, 통보적 초록은 3.4%, 국어와 영어 병기 초록은 99.5%였다. 연구방법에서 문헌사례 52.8%, 설문조사 21.1%, 실험이 26.1%였다. 문단과 문장에서 1문단이 92.1%, 2문단 이상이 7.9%, 5문장 이하가 79%, 6문장 이상이 21%, 1인칭 사용이 90.5%로 나타났다. 주제영역은 도서관/정보센터경영 19.4%, 정보서비스 17.3%, 정보공학 16.4%, 정보검색 15.1%, 계량정보 9.6% 등의 순으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the characteristics of abstracts by analyzing the status of abstracts published in ‘Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management.’ To this end, the study analyzed the components of and the types of abstracts. Target abstracts were those published in the journal from 1984 to 2015. The journal published 1,168 articles with indicative abstracts accounting for 96.6%, informative abstracts 3.4%, and abstracts written in both English and Korean 99.5%. As for research methods, case study through literature review was 52.8%, surveys 21.1%, and experimentation 26.1%. The percentage of abstracts consisting of one paragraph was 92.1%, more than two paragraphs were 7.9%, fewer than 5 sentences were 79%, and 6 sentences or more were 21%. The use of the first person was 90.5%. In terms of topic areas, library and information center management was 19.4%, information services 17.3%, information technology 16.2%, information retrieval 15.1%, and informetrics 9.6%, etc.

참고문헌

1

국회예산정책처. (2014). 2015년도 예산안 분야별 분석 I. 국회예산정책처.

2

김재수. (1992). 표제와 초록의 색인성과 정보량 분석. 정보관리연구, 23(2), 1-13.

3

김홍렬. (2015). 국내 문헌정보학분야 학술지의 상호인용관계 분석. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.007.

4

김현희. (2008). 영상 초록 구현을 위한 키프레임 추출 알고리즘의 설계와 성능 평가. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 131-148.

5

노진영. (2003). 색인초록작성법:공주대학교출판부.

6

문헌정보학용어사전 편찬위원회. (2010). 문헌정보학 용어사전:한국도서관협회.

7

産業技術情報院. (1992). 抄錄 및 索引論:産業技術情報院.

8

윤구호. (2001). 색인․초록:한국도서관협회.

9

이수상. (2011). 정보검색의 세계:한국도서관협회.

10

이준호. (1996). 한글 문서의 효과적인 검색을 위한 n-Gram 기반의 색인방법. 정보관리학회지, 13(1), 47-63.

11

이태영. (1990). 한국어 초록문의 문장과 내용에 대한 연구. 정보관리연구, 21(1), 1-33.

12

이태영. (1992). 한국어 초록 작성의 자동화에 관한 연구 : 미생물학 분야 학술지의 논문을 대상으로.

13

日本科學技術情報流通技術基準委員會. 科學技術情報流通技術基準 SIST 01-1980 抄 錄作成.

14

장우권. (2015). 초록의 구조와 속성에 관한 연구 (83-86). 제22회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

15

장혜란. (1996). 한글초록의 현황과 내용분석-사회과학분야 저자초록을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 30(1), 35-48.

16

최상희. (2012). 문서 클러스터링을 위한 학술지 논문의 구조적 초록 활용성 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 331-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.331.

17

American National Standards Institute. ANSI Z39.14 Writing abstracts.

18

Borko, H.. (1975). Abstracting concepts and methods:Academic Press.

19

Borko, H.. (1963). Criteria for acceptable abstracts: A survey of abstracter’s instructions. American Documentation, 14(2), 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140211.

20

Critical Abstract. (1929). . British Journal of Medical Psychology, 9(3), 263-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1929.tb01406.x.

21

Chu, Heting. (2011). 디지털시대의 정보 표현과 검색:한국도서관협회.

22

Cleveland, D. B.. (1990). 색인 및 초록작성법:구미무역.

23

Dronberger, G. B.. (1975). Abstract readability as a factor of information system. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 26(2), 108-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260206.

24

Fidel, R.. (1986). The possible effect of abstracting guidelines on retrieval performance of freetext searching. Information Processing & Management, 22(4), 309-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(86)90029-4.

25

Fidel, R.. (1986). Writing abstracts for free-text searching. Journal of Documentation, 42(1), 11-21.

26

Hahs-Vaughn, D. L.. (2010). Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: A mixed methods case study of the journal research in the schools. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.08.004.

27

Hartley, J.. (1997). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?. Learned Publishing, 10(4), 313-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531519750146789.

28

Hartley, J.. (1998). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals?. Journal of Information Science, 24(5), 359-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159802400508.

29

Hartley, J.. (2000). Clarifying the abstracts of systematic reviews. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(4), 332-337.

30

Hartley, J.. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal of abstracts in psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250301.

31

ISO. ISO 214: Abstracts for publications and documentation.

32

King, R. A.. (1976). A comparison of the readability of abstracts with their source documentations. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 27(2), 118-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270207.

33

Lancaster, F. W.. (1991). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice:The Library Association.

34

Lancaster, F. W.. (1998). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice:University of Illinois.

35

Nakayma, T.. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237-242.

36

Rowley, J. E.. (1982). Abstracting and indexing:Clive Bingley.

37

Rowley, J. E.. (1988). Abstracting and indexing:Clive Bingley.

38

Sharma, S.. (2006). Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 130(4), 523-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.023.

39

Slutkin, N. A.. (1987). Analysis of information content of patent abstracts. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 14(6), 84-88.

40

Stevenson, H. A.. (2009). Structured abstracts: Do they improve citation retrieval from dental journals?. Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/14653120722932.

41

Tenopir, C.. (1993). Quality of abstracts. Online, 17(3), 44-55.

42

Tibbo, H. R.. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines. Library and Information Science Research, 14, 31-56.

43

Wagers, R.. (1983). Effective searching in database abstracts. Online, 7(5), 60-77.

44

Weil, B. H.. (1970). Standards for writing abstracts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21(5), 351-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630210507.

정보관리학회지