바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

대학도서관의 역할변화에 관한 사서의 인식조사 연구

A Study on Librarians' Perception about the Changing Role of University Libraries

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.2, pp.227-256
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.227
노영희 (건국대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구의 목적은 대학도서관이 급격한 환경변화 속에 있는 대학의 환경을 반영하고, 정보기술의 발전을 반영함으로써 대학을 리드하는 기관으로서 우뚝 서기 위한 전략을 모색하기 위함이다. 이를 위해 대학도서관 사서들을 대상으로 설문을 수행하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대학도서관 사서는 대학도서관과 관련된 빅이슈가 「대학도서관진흥법」, 대학도서관 평가 및 평가지표, 대학에서의 대학도서관의 가치, 대학도서관의 공간구성 및 기능변화라고 하였고, 대학의 환경변화, 정부의 대학에 대한 정책, 각종 국책사업, 각종 구조개혁이 대학도서관에 영향을 상당히 미친다고 하였다. 둘째, 대학도서관 사서는 도서관의 역할 변화로 학생의 정보자원 및 기술의 활용능력 향상, 학생의 독서능력 향상, 대학구성원의 연구능력 향상, 대학구성원 학습역량 향상 등에 기여할 수 있다고 하였다. 셋째, 대학도서관 사서는 이용자가 대학도서관에 가장 높게 요구하는 서비스를 전자책 및 정보자원의 확대 등으로 생각하고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This study was carried out for the university library to find out a strategy to stand tall as an institution to lead the university, by reflecting the university environment having with drastic environmental changes and reflecting the evolution of information technology. As a result, first, university librarians responded that big issues related to the university library is the University Library Promotion Act, University Library evaluation and assessment indicators, the value of university libraries at the university, and changing spatial composition and functions of the university library. Second, university librarians responded that changes of the university environment, government policy on universities, various national projects, and various university reform policy significantly affect to the university library. Third, about what you think would be helpful to the crisis in their universities as changing role of the library, they responded that they can contribute in terms of improving students’ information and technology literacy, improving students’ reading skills, improving research capacity, and improve students’ learning ability. Fourth, they responded that services that users demand the highest in the university library will be expansion of e-books and information resource.

참고문헌

1

김용근. (2003). 대학도서관이 당면하고 있는 현실적인 문제. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 34(2), 297-315.

2

노영희. (2014). 도서관 무한창조공간 구축 및 운영모형 제안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 53-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.053.

3

노영희. (2014). 차세대디지털도서관의 발전방향논의에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2), 7-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.007.

4

노영희. (2014). 차세대디지털도서관서비스에 대한 Y세대 이용자의 요구분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 29-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.029.

5

노영희. (2016). 정부 3.0에 대한 도서관 사서의 인식조사 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 27(2), 51-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.2.051.

6

송민. (2014). 빅데이터 시대, 도서관의 도전과 변화 (-). 도서관 분야 빅데이터 활용 세미나 발표자료.

7

안인자. (2014). 도서관 무한창조공간의 개념 및 프로그램에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2), 143-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.143.

8

이상주. (2013). 고등교육정책과 대학경쟁력 강화방안: 지방사립대학을 중심으로. 전산회계연구, 11(2), 83-109.

9

이혜영. (2015). 한국에서의 대학도서관 연구동향. 정보관리학회지, 32(2), 153-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.2.153.

10

정재영. (2011). 한국 문헌정보학의 현장연구 현황 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(2), 171-191.

11

ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2010). Top ten trends in academic libraries:A review of the current literature. http://thescholarship.ecu.edu/bitstream/handle/10342/2838/ACRL%20Top%20Trends.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

12

ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2012). Top ten trends in academic libraries:A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320.

13

ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2013). Environmental scan 2013. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan13.pdf.

14

ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2014). Top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College &Research Libraries News, 75(6), 294-302.

15

ALA. (2014). Four local libraries honored for offering cutting-edge services. http://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2014/02/four-local-libraries-honored-offering-cutting-edge-services.

16

Anderson, R.. (2011). The crisis in research librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 289-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.001.

17

Bell, S.. (2008). Keeping them enrolled : How academic libraries contribute to student retention. Library Issues, 29(1), 1-4.

18

Bell, S.. (2015). Top 10 Academic library issues for 2015. Library Journal. http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/02/opinion/steven-bell/top-10-academic-library-issues-for-2015-from-the-bell-tower.

19

Bell, S. J.. (2009). Online or out the door : Continuous learning for academic librarians in economic downturns. Library Issues, 29(5), 118-124.

20

Camoprodon, G.. (2013). Samples of ongoing experiences in Europe (-). Coworking Europe Conference.

21

Europeana Connect. (2011). Europeans collections. http://www.europeana.eu/.

22

Hamrick, F. A.. (2004). Predicting higher education graduation rates from institutional characteristics and resource allocation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(19), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n19.2004.

23

Kroski, E.. (2009). On the move with the mobile web : Libraries and mobile technologies. Library Technology Reports, 44(5), 1-48.

24

Macdonald, S.. (2010). Collaboration to data curation: Harnessing institutional expertise. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(S1), 4-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.505823.

25

Mathews, B.. (2012). Think like a startup: A white paper to inspire library entrepreneurialism. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/18649.

26

McGettigan, L.. (2013). Unafraid of the future-Edinburgh’s next generation library and information services. http://library.ifla.org/103/1/081-mcgettigan-en.pdf.

27

McKinsey Global Institute. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity:McKinsey Inc.

28

Mezick, E. M.. (2007). Return on investment: Libraries and student retention. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(5), 561-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.05.002.

29

Noh, Y.. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: Creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.020.

30

Primary Research Group. (2008). Survey of student retention policies in higher education:Primary Research Group.

31

Roscorla, T.. (2013). Digital public library of America opens access to resources. http://www.govtech.com/e-government/Digital-Public-Library-of-America-Opens-Access-to-Resources.html.

32

Russell, J.. (2014). Coursera launches a program to crowd-translate its online classes into new languages. http://thenextweb.com/insider/2014/04/29/coursera-launches-a-program-to-crowd-translate-its-online-classes-into-new-langufages/#gref.

33

The British Library. (2011). The British Library and Google to make 250,000 books available to all. http://www.bl.uk/press-releases/2011/june/the-british-library-and-google-to-make-250000-books-available-to-all.

34

The Economist. (2010). Data, data everywhere. http://www.economist.com/node/15557443.

35

Thorin, S. E.. (2002). The digital library: A biography:Digital Library Federation Council on Library and Information Resources.

정보관리학회지