바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

RDA 자원유형 디스플레이를 위한 고려사항에 관한 연구

A Study on the Display Considerations of RDA Resource Type

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.1, pp.33-52
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.033
이미화 (공주대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 GMD를 대체하는 RDA 자원유형인 내용유형, 매체유형, 수록매체유형의 디스플레이를 위한 고려사항을 모색하고자 한다. 연구방법으로는 문헌연구, 사례조사, 설문조사를 이용하였다. RDA 자원유형의 디스플레이 방안으로 첫째, RDA 자원유형을 디스플레이하기 위해 내용유형과 수록매체유형을 결합하는 것을 제안하였다. 둘째, RDA 내용유형과 수록매체유형을 아이콘화하는 알고리즘으로 내용유형을 나타내는 이미지와 수록매체유형 용어를 결합하는 방안과 내용유형과 수록매체유형을 모두 이미지로 표현하고 각 이미지에 해당하는 용어를 포함시키는 방안을 제안하였다. 셋째, 복합자원의 자원유형 디스플레이를 위해 필드링크와 순서를 나타내는 서브필드를 활용하여 내용유형, 수록매체유형이 세트로 유지될 수 있도록 제안하였다. 넷째, 간략화면에서 자원유형을 나타내는 아이콘은 자원이 디스플레이되는 왼쪽 상단에 두고, 상세화면에서는 자원유형을 기술사항 내에 배치하는 것을 제안하였다. 다섯째, 표출어로 ‘포맷’이라는 표현을 사용할 것을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 RDA 자원유형의 디스플레이를 계획할 때 고려사항을 제시하였으므로 도서관에서 실질적인 RDA 디스플레이 방안 마련에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

This study was to find the display considerations of RDA resource type - content type, media type, and carrier type. The Literature review, the case study, and the survey were used as the research method. 5 display strategies were suggested in this study. First, content and carrier types were better displayed than all 3 types of RDA resources. Second, two kinds of algorithm should be considered for RDA resource icon display. One was the combination of the terms of carrier types plus content types icon. The other was the combination of carrier types icon and content types icon in which the terms reflecting types must be included. Third, the subfield of 33x must be used for the paired display of content type and carrier type of multi-types resources. Fourth, in brief display, resource type icon was better positioned on the left and upper side and in detailed display, resource types were better located in description area. Fifth, ‘format’ was used as display indication phrase. This study would contribute to the design for the resource display by suggesting the practical display considerations of RDA resource type.

참고문헌

1

국립중앙도서관. (2014). 한국문헌자동화목록형식. http://www.nl.go.kr/common/jsp/kormarc_2014/index.html.

2

이미화. (2011). KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새로운 방안 모색. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(2), 237-255.

3

이미화. (2011). RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3), 103-121.

4

Blythe, K. C.. (2013). Resource Description and Access: It’s really not so bad. Serials Review, 39, 175-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.07.008.

5

Caudle, D. M.. (2014). Keep it simple: Using RDA’s content, media, and carrier type fields to simplify format display issues. Journal of Library Metadata, 14, 222-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.984572.

6

Cronin, C.. (2011). From testing to implementation: Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 626-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616263.

7

El-Sherbini, M.. (2011). Resource description and access “RDA": New code for cataloging. The Serials Librarian, 60, 7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526x.2011.556425.

8

Hider, P.. (2009). A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639370902929755.

9

JSC for Development of RDA. RDA : Resource Description and Access.

10

Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (2015). MARC21 format for bibliographic data. https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic.

11

Library of Congress, Program for Cooperative Cataloging, Post-implementation Hybrid Bibliographic Records Guidelines Task Group. (2013). Report of the PCC Post-Implementation Hybrid Bibliographic Records Guidelines Task Group. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/RDA%20Task%20groups%20and%20charges/Hybrid-Report-Sept-2011.pdf.

12

McCutcheon, S.. (2011). RDA testing in triplicate: Kent State University’s experiences with RDA testing. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 607-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616262.

13

McCutcheon, S.. (2012). RDA and the reference librarian: What to expect from the new cataloging standard. Reference Librarian, 53, 123-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2011.607409.

14

McCutcheon, S.. (2012). Innovative millennium RDA display issues: MARC tags 264 and 336-338 (-). Paper presented at EGL IUG.

15

OCLC. (2013). OCLC RDA policy statement. http://oclc.org/rda/newpolicy.en.htm.

16

Ou, C.. (2014). Displaying content, media, and carrier types in the OPAC: questions and considerations. Journal of Library Metadata, 14, 229-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.990846.

17

Panchyshyn, R. S.. (2014). RDA display and the general material designation: an innovative solution. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(5), 487-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.902893.

18

U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf.

정보관리학회지