바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

TPIPF로 계산된 이용자프로파일을 적용한 논문추천시스템에 대한 연구

A Study on Scientific Article Recommendation System with User Profile Applying TPIPF

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.1, pp.317-336
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.317
장령령 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
장우권 (전남대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

오늘날 폭발적인 정보의 증가로 이용자들은 자신이 원하는 정보를 찾기 위해 엄청난 시간과 노력을 기울여야 한다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위하여 이용자의 정보요구를 분석하고 이용자에게 적합한 논문을 추천해주는 논문추천시스템이 등장하고 있다. 그러나 대부분의 논문추천시스템은 논문추천시스템의 핵심인 이용자 프로파일을 간과하고 있다. 따라서 이 연구는 논문추천시스템의 성능을 좌우하는 이용자 프로파일을 기존의 평균으로 계산하지 않고 새로운 TPIPF(Topic Proportion-Inverse Paper Frequency)로 계산하는 방법을 제안하였다. 제안된 방법과 기존의 방법을 모두 논문추천시스템에 적용하여 각각의 성능을 온라인 참고문헌 관리도구인 CiteULike에서 제공된 데이터 실험을 통하여 비교하였다. 그 결과 제안된 TPIPF 방법을 적용한 논문추천시스템의 성능이 더 높다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Abstract

Nowadays users spend more time and effort to find what they want because of information overload. To solve the problem, scientific article recommendation system analyse users’ needs and recommend them proper articles. However, most of the scientific article recommendation systems neglected the core part, user profile. Therefore, in this paper, instead of mean which applied in user profile in previous studies, New TPIPF (Topic Proportion-Inverse Paper Frequency) was applied to scientific article recommendation system. Moreover, the accuracy of two scientific article recommendation systems with above different methods was compared with experiments of public dataset from online reference manager, CiteULike. As a result, the proposed scientific article recommendation system with TPIPF was proven to be better.

참고문헌

1

이지현. (2011). 인용논문 분석을 통한 학술 문서 추천 시스템 (-). 한국정보처리학회 춘계학술발표대회. 한국정보처리학회.

2

여운동. (2010). 연구논문 추천시스템의 전자도서관 적용방안. 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(11), 10-19.

3

최호연. (2013). 전자 도서관 도메인에서 의미적 관계를 이용한 개인화된 논문 추천 시스템. 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 40(3), 164-175.

4

Beel, J.. (2013). Introducing docear’s research paper recommender system (459-460). Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEECS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

5

Blei, D. M.. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-aoas114.

6

Blei, D. M.. (2009). Text mining: classification, clustering, and applications:CRC Press.

7

Blei, D. M.. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.

8

Bogers, T.. (2008). Recommending scientific articles using CiteULike (287-290). Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.

9

Burke, R.. (2002). Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 331-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dictap.2012.6215409.

10

Chandrasekaran, K.. (2008). Concept-based document recommendations for Citeseer authors (83-92). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems.

11

Choochaiwattana, W.. (2010). Usage of tagging for research paper recommendation (439-442). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering.

12

CiteULike. (2016). dataset. http://www.citeulike.org/faq/data.adp.

13

Ferrara, F.. (2011). A keyphrase-based paper recommender system (14-25). Proceedings of Italian Research Conference (IRCDL 2011).

14

Griffiths, T. L.. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5228-5235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101.

15

Grün, B.. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13.

16

He, Q.. (2010). Context-aware citation recommendation (421-430). Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web.

17

Henning, V.. (2008). Mendeley-a Last.fm for Research? (327-328). IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.

18

Hornik, K.. (2011). Topicmodels: an R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/escience.2008.128.

19

Huang, W.. (2012). Recommending citations: translating papers into references (1910-1914). Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.

20

Hwang, S.. (2004). Combining article content and Web usage for literature recommendation in digital libraries. Online Information Review, 28(4), 260-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520410553750.

21

James, G.. (2014). introduction to statistical learning:with applications in R:Springer.

22

Jiang, Y.. (2012). Recommending academic papers via users’ reading purposes (241-244). Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.

23

Liang, T.. (2008). A semantic-expansion approach to personalized knowledge recommendation. Decision Support Systems, 45(3), 401-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.05.004.

24

Lops, P.. (2011). Recommender systems handbook:Springer.

25

Middleton, S. E.. (2001). Capturing knowledge of user preferences: ontologies in recommender systems (100-107). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001).

26

Pudhiyaveetil, A.. (2009). Conceptual recommender system for CiteSeerX (241-244). Proceedings of the third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.

27

Sarkar, Deepayan. (2008). Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R:Springer.

28

Sarwar, B.. (2001). Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms (285-295). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web.

29

Shani, G.. (2011). ecommender Systems Handbook:Springer.

30

Sugiyama, K.. (2010). Scholarly paper recommendation via user’s recent research interests (29-38). Proceedings of Joint Conference of Digital Libraries.

31

Torres, R.. (2004). Enhancing digital libraries with Techlens+ (228-236). Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

32

Vellino, A. (2010). A comparison between usage-based and citation-based methods for recommending scholarly research articles (1-2). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

33

Wallach, H. M.. (2008). Structured topic models for language.

정보관리학회지