바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.1
Citation Share

전문연구자의 학문배경에 따른 인용행태에 관한 연구

A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.1, pp.247-268
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.247
오유진 (전북대학교)
오효정 (전북대학교)
김종혁 (전북대학교)
김용 (전북대학교)
오유진, 오효정, 김종혁, & 김용. (2016). 전문연구자의 학문배경에 따른 인용행태에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(1), 247-268, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.247
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers’ characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal’s reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.

keywords
citation behavior, citation motivation, bibliometrics, professional researcher, reference analysis, survey analysis, 인용행태, 인용동기, 계량서지, 전문연구자, 참고문헌분석, 설문분석

참고문헌

1.

Abt, H. A.. (1993). Institutional productivities. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105, 794-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/133232.

2.

Ahmed, T.. (2004). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited: Part II., The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics, 61(2), 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290504.

3.

Baldi, S.. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657504.

4.

Baird, L. M.. (1994). Do citations matter?. Journal of Information Science, 20(1), 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159402000102.

5.

Beaver, D. B.. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics, 60(3), 399-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034382.85360.cd.

6.

Brooks, T. A.. (1985). Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402.

7.

Brooks, T. A.. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630370106.

8.

Bornmann, L.. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150.

9.

Burrell, Q. L.. (2003). Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 372-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10207.

10.

Camacho-Miñano, M.. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 754-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21018.

11.

Cano, V.. (1989). Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198907)40:4<284::aid-asi10>3.0.co;2-z.

12.

최선희. (2011). A Study of Citing Patterns of Korean Scientists on Korean Journals. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 97-115.

13.

Chubin, D. E.. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?. Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500403.

14.

Cole, S.. (1975). The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

15.

Cronin, B.. (1981). Agreement and divergence on referencing practice. Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 27-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555158100300104.

16.

Cronin, B.. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication:Taylor Graham.

17.

Cullars, J.. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. Library Quarterly, 60(1), 337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602265.

18.

Frost, C. O.. (1989). The literature of online public access catalogs. 1980-85 : An analysis of citation patterns. Library Resources and Technical Services, 33(4), 344-357.

19.

Garfield, E.. (1965). Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation:National Bureau of Standards.

20.

Garfield, E.. (1996). When to cite. Library Quarterly, 66(4), 449-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602912.

21.

Gilbert, G. N.. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700112.

22.

Han, J.. (2008). Preliminary study on bibliometric citation analysis of the oceanographic journals (229-234). Proceedings of the 15th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management.

23.

Hanney, S.. (2005). From bench to bedside: Tracing the payback forwards from basic or early clinical research - a preliminary exercise and proposals for a future study. The Health Economics Research Group. Brunel University.

24.

Harwood, N.. (2009). Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20789.

25.

Haslam, N.. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8.

26.

Hooten, P. A.. (1991). Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6), 397-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199107)42:6<397::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-n.

27.

Hurt, C. D.. (1985). Methodological citation differences in science, technology and social sciences literature. Library and Information Science Research, 7(4), 345-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(87)90033-1.

28.

Kaplan, N.. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160305.

29.

Kim, Byung-kyu. (2011). A study on adding index terms for improving the retrieval efficiency of the STI database (293-294). The Korea Contents Society.

30.

김병규. (2011). Citing Behavior of Korean Scientists on Foreign Journals in KSCD. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 117-133.

31.

Kim, S.. (2003). A study on citation analysis of design science literature (233-244). Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management.

32.

김완종. (2012). 한국 과학기술 논문의 인용속도 및 인용빈도에 영향을 미치는 서지 요인에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(4), 285-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.285.

33.

Klamer, A.. (2002). Attention and the art of scientific publishing. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(3), 289-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178022000015104.

34.

Latour, B.. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts:Princeton University Press.

35.

Lawani, S. M.. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604.

36.

Leimu, R.. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(1), 28-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010.

37.

Liu, M.. (1993). A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists. Journal of Information Science, 19(1), 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900103.

38.

Liu, M.. (1993). Progress in documentation - the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026920.

39.

Macroberts, M. H.. (1986). Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16(1), 151-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631286016001008.

40.

Merton, R. K.. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations:University of Chicago Press.

41.

Moed, H. F.. (2004). In basic science the percentage of ‘authoritative’ references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics, 60(3), 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034375.39385.84.

42.

Moed, H. F.. (1989). Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 15(2), 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102831538901500205.

43.

Moravcsik, M. J.. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citation. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106.

44.

남영준. (2011). 우리나라 토목공학분야 연구자의 인용행태에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 201-220.

45.

Nicolaisen, J.. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120.

46.

Peters, H. P. F.. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1<39::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-q.

47.

Prabha, C. G.. (1983). Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340305.

48.

Rabow, H.. (2005). The discovery of discoveries: Exploring the dissemination of major findings in the life sciences (322-326). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

49.

Rousseau, R.. (2000). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations with in the country? A case study (173-176). Collaboration in Science and in Technology: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics.

50.

Shadish, W. R.. (1995). Author judgments about works they cite -three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003003.

51.

Sievert, M. E.. (1989). An editor’s influence on citation patterns: A case study of Elementary School Journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 334-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5<334::aid-asi6>3.0.co;2-s.

52.

Snyder, H. W.. (1991). Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02017571.

53.

Snyder, H.. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551984232414.

54.

Soper, M. E.. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(4), 397-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/620584.

55.

Stewart, J. A.. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62(1), 166-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2578354.

56.

Sweetland, J. H.. (1989). Errors in bibliographic citations: A continuing problem. Library Quarterly, 59(4), 291-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602160.

57.

van Dalen, H. P.. (2005). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years?. Population and Development Review, 30, 489-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00025.x.

58.

Vinkler, P.. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation mode. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 47-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016689.

59.

Wang, P.. (1996). A qualitative study of scholars’ citation behavior. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 255-261.

60.

Wang, P.. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/629929.

61.

Wang, P.. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 98-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:2<98::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-l.

62.

White, H. D.. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89.

63.

Wuchty, S.. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099.

64.

윤석경. (2007). 인용분석에 의한 행정학분야 학술지의 특성. 한국공공관리학보, 21(3), 113-139.

65.

Zuckerman, H.. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 329-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016675.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책