바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.3
Citation Share

An Analysis on Trends and Tasks of Open Data Policy in the Digital Era

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2015, v.32 no.3, pp.49-68
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.049

(2015). An Analysis on Trends and Tasks of Open Data Policy in the Digital Era. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 49-68, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.049
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

There were not many ways to share research data in the past, but modern information technology has allowed us to share these data. As data sharing has its side effects, researchers’ attitude and practice to sharing data vary by individual discipline. This study found that foreign learned societies, NGOs, universities and research funders support data sharing in a utilitarian perspective, while major publishers demand it so that other researchers can verify the data in peer review. It is important that open data policy should be settled down in near future for evoking further studies and encouraging progress in science. In order to establish data sharing successfully in Korea, efforts could be made by researchers, universities, academic libraries, and governments as well as the stakeholder. This study also proposed specific ways to perform it.

keywords
오픈 데이터, 연구데이터, 데이터 아카이빙, 데이터 공유, 리포지터리, 데이터관리계획, open data, research data, data archiving, data sharing, repository, DMP

Reference

1.

강희종. (2012). 21세기 핵심자원, 국가과학데이터 활용을 위한 정책 과제. .

2.

김문정. (2015). 과학기술분야 연구자의 연구데이터 공유의 영향요인에 대한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(2), 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313.

3.

김선태. (2010). 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93.

4.

김지현. (2012). 대학 내 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 43(3), 433-455.

5.

김지현. (2013). 국외 정부연구비지원기관의 연구데이터 관리정책 분석 - 미국, 영국, 캐나다, 호주를 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 251-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.251.

6.

남궁용권. (2008). 논문 작성의 이론과 실제:양서원.

7.

박성욱. (2011). 국가 과학데이터센터 구축의 경제적 파급효과 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 55-69.

8.

성진석. (2011). 연구관련 산출물 관리체계 구축. .

9.

신영란. (2011). 사회과학 데이터 아카이브 서비스. .

10.

신영란. (2012). 국내 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 93-115.

11.

윤종민. (2013). 과학데이터에 관한 입법례와 관리정책 그리고 대응방안†-호주, 미국, 중국을 중심으로-. 기술혁신학회지, 16(1), 63-100.

12.

이상환. (2009). 과학데이터의 공유와 활용. .

13.

한국과학기술정보연구원. (2012). 국가 과학데이터 공유․활용체제 구축. 교육과학기술부.

14.

Brown, S.. (2015). Guidelines for the deposit and preservation of research data in Canada. http://www.rdc-drc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Guidelines-for-Deposit-of-Research-Data-in-Canada-2015.pdf.

15.

Callaghan, S.. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

16.

Caulfield, T.. (2012). Open science versus commercialization: A modern research conflict. Genome Medicine, 4(17), -. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gm316.

17.

Dimitrova, V.. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

18.

Kansa, E. C.. (2013). We all know that a 14 is a sheep: Data publication and professionalism in archaeological communication. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies, 1(1), 88-97.

19.

Karunakara, U.. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

20.

Kim, Jeonghyun. (2013). Data sharing and its implications for academic libraries. New Library World, 114(11/12), 494-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2013-0051.

21.

(2015). KOSSDA. http://www.kossda.or.kr/w01_03a.asp.

22.

Kratz, J.. (2014). Data publication consensus and controversies. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.2.

23.

Mounce, R.. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

24.

Murphy, F.. (2014). Data and scholarly publishing: The transforming landscape. Learned Publishing, 27, S3-S7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20140502.

25.

Nature Publishing Group. (2013). Availability of data and materials. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.

26.

Nature Publishing Group. (2015). Getting published in Nature: The editorial process. http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/get_published/index.html#a1.

27.

Norman, H.. (2014). Mandating data archiving: Experiences from the frontline. Learned Publishing, 27, S35-S38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20140507.

28.

PLOS. (2013). Data access for the open access literature: PLOS’s data policy. https://www.plos.org/data-access-for-the-open-access-literature-ploss-data-policy/.

29.

Pollard, T.. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

30.

Research Councils UK. (2013). RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf.

31.

Royal Society. (2012). Science as an open enterprise. .

32.

van den Bos, W. (2014). Issues in open research data:Ubiquity Press.

33.

Vines, T. H.. (2013). Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. The FASEB Journal, 27, 1304-1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-218164.

34.

The White House OSTP. (2013). Expanding public access to the results of federally funded research. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/02/22/expanding-public-access-results-federally-funded-research.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy