바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Analysis of Related Movie Information Using The Co-Word Method

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.4, pp.161-178
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.161

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Recently, many information services allow users to collaborate to produce and use information. Sharing information is also important for users who have similar taste or interest. As various channels are available for users to share their experiences and knowledge, users’ data have also been accumulated within the information services. This study collected movie lists made by users of IMDB service. Co-word analysis and ego-centered network analysis were adapted to discover relevant information for users who chose a specific movie. Three factors of movies including movie title, director and genre were used to present related movie information. Movie title is an effective feature to present related movies with various aspects such as theme or characters and the popularity of directors affects on identifying related directors. Genre is not useful to find related movies due to the complexity in the topic of a movie.

keywords
동시출현단어, 용어계량분석, 네트워크분석, 이용자추천정보, 자아중심 네트워크, informetric analysis, co-word analysis, network analysis, user recommendation, ego-centered network

Reference

1.

강범일. (2013). 프로파일링 분석과 동시출현단어 분석을 이용한 한국어교육학의 정체성 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 195-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195.

2.

김상화. (2012). 협력적 필터링과 콘텐츠 정보를 결합한 영화 추천 알고리즘. 정보과학회논문지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 39(4), 261-268.

3.

김판준. (2007). 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 285-303.

4.

김하진. (2014). 동시출현단어 분석을 통한 국내외 정보학 학회지 연구동향 파악. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 99-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.099.

5.

서선경. (2013). 동시출현단어 분석 기반 오픈 액세스 분야 지적구조에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(1), 207-228.

6.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

7.

이재윤. (2007). 국내 광역 과학 지도 생성 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 363-383.

8.

이재윤. (2012). 자기 인용 네트워크와 인용 정체성을 이용한 연구자의 연구 이력 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157.

9.

이재윤. (2013). tnet과 WNET의 가중 네트워크 중심성 지수 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 241-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241.

10.

장령령. (2014). 학술지 중요도와 키워드 순서를 고려한 단어동시출현 분석을 이용한 독서분야의 지적구조 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(1), 295-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295.

11.

최상희. (2014). 이용자 추천정보를 기반으로 한 가수 이미지 분석 (7-10). 제21회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회논문집.

12.

Åström, F.. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.

13.

Bar-Ilan, J.. (2008). Which h-index?-A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.

14.

Buter, R. K.. (2002). Using bibliometric maps to visualise term distribution in scientific papers (697-). In Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation.

15.

Callon, M.. (1983). From translations to problematic networks : An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22, 191-235.

16.

Callon, M.. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology:Sociology of Science in the Real World:Macmillan Press.

17.

Carrer-Neto, W.. (2012). knowledge-based recommender system. Application to the movies domain, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10990-11000.

18.

Chen, C.. (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 401-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5.

19.

Janssens, F.. (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1614-1642.

20.

Kant, V.. (2013). Integrating collaborative and reclusive methods for effective recommendations : A fuzzy Bayesian approach. International Journal of Interlligent Systems, 28(11), 1099-1123.

21.

McCain, K. W.. (1995). R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis (275-282). Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Pine Forest, Il.

22.

Nebelong-Bonnevie, E.. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image : A portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57.

23.

Ni, J.. (2014). Ceiling effect of online user interests for the movies. Physica A, 402, 134-140.

24.

Pera, M. S.. (2013). A group recommender for movies based on content similarity and popularity. Information Processing and Management, 49(3), 673-687.

25.

Porter, A. L.. (2005). QTIP : Quick technology intelligence processes. Technological Forecasting &Social Change, 72, 1070-1081.

26.

서은경. (2013). Detecting Research Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.215.

27.

Todorov, R.. (1992). Displaying content of scientific journals : A co-heading analysis. Scientometrics, 23(2), 319-334.

28.

Tsay, M. Y.. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals : JASIST, IPM & JOD, 1988-2008. Scientometrics, 89(2), 591-606.

29.

Tseng, Y.. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1216-1247.

30.

White, H. D.. (2000). The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield:Information Today, Inc.

31.

White, H. D.. (1998). Visualizing a discipline : An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.

32.

Zhang, L.. (2014). Novel recommendation of user-based collaborative filtering. Journal of Digital Information Management, 12(3), 165-175.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management