바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.1
Citation Share

대학도서관 사서의 조직몰입과 목표인식에 대한 연구: 질적 접근

A Study on Organizational Commitment and Goal Perception of University Librarians: A Qualitative Approach

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.1, pp.251-275
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.251
박자현 (연세대학교)
김기영 (연세대학교)
박자현, & 김기영. (2014). 대학도서관 사서의 조직몰입과 목표인식에 대한 연구: 질적 접근. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 251-275, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.251
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 대학도서관 사서의 조직몰입을 입체적으로 이해하고 이러한 조직몰입을 도서관 조직 차원에서 관리하는 방안을 검토하기 위하여 심층면담을 통해 사서의 조직몰입에 대한 원인을 살펴보고 조직몰입과 목표인식과의 관계를 질적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 다수의 연구참여자는 근무하는 도서관에 대한 조직몰입에 대해 현재의 도서관 상황에서는 조직몰입하기 어렵다고 응답하였다. 그 원인으로 물리적 보상, 조직분위기, 조직 내의 관계, 근무조건 등 위생요인의 불만족과 직무, 성취감, 책임감, 승진 등 동기유발요인이 만족되지 않음을 언급하였다. 따라서 조직몰입은 다양한 동기요인 및 근무환경의 복합적인 결과로 판단된다. 둘째, 조직목표에 대한 인식에 대해서, 긍정적인 목표인식은 직무만족, 성취감 등 동기요인 뿐만 아니라 물리적 보상에 대한 불만해소, 조직분위기, 동료관계에 대한 변화 등 위생요인과도 긍정적인 관계를 보였다. 이에 따라 사서의 도서관목표에 대한 인식은 조직몰입의 동기요인과 위생요인 충족과 관련이 있으며, 목표인식 개선을 통하여 사서의 조직몰입이 조직적으로 관리될 여지가 있는 것으로 파악되었으며, 향후, 이러한 결과를 기반으로 목표인식과 조직몰입의 관계에 대한 확증적 연구의 필요성을 제기하였다.

keywords
조직몰입, 동기부여, 목표인식, 목표설정, 대학도서관경영, organizational commitment, motivation, goals perception, goal setting, management of university libraries

Abstract

This study conducted qualitative research to investigate the librarians’ organizational commitment and relations between the commitment and their goal recognition in the university library context with several open-ended, deep interviews with university librarians in order to understand the relations from diverse perspectives. As a result, many participants showed low level of organizational commitment because of their hygiene factors, such as payment, incentives, relations with colleagues, and job conditions as well as motivators including characteristics of the work, sense of accomplishment, responsibility, promotion, and self-improvement. The two factors are considered to have direct impacts on their organizational commitment. Also, the research revealed that positive goal perception was related to motivators and, at the same time, hygiene factors. Accordingly, we concluded that librarians’ perception of goals are closely related to both hygiene factors and motivators. We also identify that a need of a statistical study with a questionnaire survey to confirm the relations between the organizational commitment and goal perception for developing managerial measures for the organizational commitment, and further, for better library performance.

keywords
조직몰입, 동기부여, 목표인식, 목표설정, 대학도서관경영, organizational commitment, motivation, goals perception, goal setting, management of university libraries

참고문헌

1.

김기영. (2008). 전문직으로서의 사서직 논의를 위한 이론적 접근. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(1), 313-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.1.313.

2.

김영천. (2012). 질적연구방법론:아카데미프레스.

3.

심효정. (2006). 공공도서관 사서들의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(4), 307-331.

4.

엄영애. (2004). 사서직의 전문직 요건과 수행업무에 대한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(3), 159-175.

5.

유길호. (2001). 사서들의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향요인 분석 : 부산지역 공공도서관을 중심으로. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 32(2), 1-20.

6.

윤경아. (2011). 내부마케팅과 조직몰입의 관계에서 팔로워십의 매개효과 연구.

7.

이명희. (2005). 문헌정보학 분야의 질적 연구 동향과 과제. 한국비블리아학회지, 16(2), 177-201.

8.

이은철. (2006). 직무요인이 공공도서관 사서들의 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 37(4), 419-442.

9.

최동주. (2010). 조직신뢰와 조직시민행동간의 다차원적 조직몰입 매개효과 검증 -외식기업을 중심으로-. 기업경영연구, 17(2), 23-41.

10.

Alderfer, C. P.. (1969). An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142-175.

11.

Allen, N. J.. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitments to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

12.

Allen, N. J.. (1996). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization : an examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252-276.

13.

Ambrose, M. L.. (1999). Old Friends, New faces : Motivation Research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 231-292.

14.

Arnett, D. B.. (2002). Using job satisfaction and pride as internal-marketing tools. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 87-96.

15.

Avrey, R. D.. (1989). Job satisfaction : Environmental and genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 187-192.

16.

Bateman, T.. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier : The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 586-595.

17.

Becker, B. E.. (1999). Strategic human resource management in five leading firms. Human Resource Management, 38(4), 287-302.

18.

Becker, H. S.. (1960). Note son the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 40-53.

19.

Etzioni, A.. (1961). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations : On Power, Involvement, and their Correlates:The Free Press.

20.

Ford, M. E.. (1992). Motivating Humans : Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs:Sage Publications.

21.

Herzberg, F.. (1965). The motivation to work among finish supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 18, 393-402.

22.

Herzberg, F.. (1987). An exhibit from one more time : How do you motivate employees?. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 109-120.

23.

Kaplan, R. S.. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

24.

Locke, E. A.. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157-189.

25.

Locke, E. A.. (1984). Goal-Setting : A Motivational Technique that Works:Prentice-Hall.

26.

Locke, E. A.. (1990). A Theory of Goal-Setting and Task Performance:Prentice-Hall.

27.

Locke, E. A.. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

28.

Maslow, A. H.. (1954). Motivation and Personality:Harper and Row.

29.

McCormick. C. A.. (2000). A Study of the Job Attitudes(Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Career Commitment) and Career Adaptability of Members of the Library and Information Science Profession.

30.

Mitchell. T. R.. (1997). Matching motivation strategies with organizational contexts. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 57-149.

31.

Mowday, R. T.. (1983). Employee Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover:Academic Press.

32.

Muhammad R. A.. (2010). Relationship among leadership style, organizational culture and employee commitment in university libraries. Library Management, 31(4), 253-266.

33.

O'Reilly, C. A.. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment : The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 492-499.

34.

Parrish. D. A.. (2001). The Impact of Leadership Behavior on Organizational Commitment and Job Autonomy of Information Services Librarians.

35.

Pinder, C. C.. (1998). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior:Prentice Hall.

36.

Shore, L. M.. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior : comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 774-780.

37.

Staw, B. M.. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes : A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56-77.

38.

Steve, M. J.. (2011). Organizational Psychology:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

39.

Thatcher, J. B.. (2003). Turn over of information technology workers : Examining empirically the influence of attitudes, job characteristics, and external markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(3), 231-261.

40.

Wagner, S.. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior : context, disposition and age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 379-991.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책