바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

정보공유공간이 이용자 유동패턴과 도서관인식에 미치는 영향

The Influence of Information Commons on User Traffic Patterns and Perceptions of the Library

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.4, pp.93-110
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.093
박지홍 (연세대학교)
박진희 (연세대학교)
남은경 (연세대학교)
이서하 (연세대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

During the last decade, increasing use of technology that facilitates information access has changed academic library services. The emergence of information commons is one of the key changes. Most previous studies on information commons have focused on its conception and role. Whereas, considering information commons as a spatial service, this study aims to examine the influence of information commons on user traffic patterns within the library and perception of the library. As the information commons grew into main library service space and facility, it is necessary to explore what influences information commons have on the behavior and recognition of users. Two methods were used. First, observation method was used to record traffic pattern and user behavior. Second, twenty undergraduates and twelve graduates were interviewed regarding the use and recognition of the information commons and the library. The results of the study show that the traffic patterns were different between undergraduate students and graduate students; the location and structure of facilities influences their movement and behaviors; and the recognition of information commons tends to affect the perception of the entire library. The findings may help librarians improve and plan for library spaces to meet user demands.

참고문헌

1

배경재. (2010). 과학기술분야 학술정보 서비스 대학 이용자의 정보요구 및 이용행태 차이 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(2), 157-176.

2

Barret, A.. (2005). The Information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4), 324-331.

3

Beagle, D.. (1999). Conceptualizing an information commons. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(2), 82-89.

4

Beagle, D.. (2010). Emergent information commons : Philosophy, models, and 21st century learning paradigms. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 7-26.

5

Beatty, S.. (2010). Information commons, University of Calgary : Providing service through collaboration and integration. Journal of Library Administration, 50(2), 145-159.

6

Bennett, S.. (2003). Libraries designed for learning:Coucile on the Library and Information Resources.

7

Bordonaro, K.. (2013). Internationalization and the North American University Library:Scarecrow Press.

8

Bryant, J.. (2009). Academic libraries and social and learning space : A case study of Loughborough University Library, UK. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 7-18.

9

Callinan., J. E.. (2005). Information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate biology students: A comparative analysis of first year and final year students in University College Dublin. Library Review, 54(2), 86-99.

10

Campbell, D. E.. (1979). Library design influences on user behavior and satisfaction. Library Quarterly, 49(1), 26-41.

11

Cullen, R.. (2001). Perspectives on user satisfaction surveys. Library Trends, 49(2), 662-686.

12

Fister, B.. (2004). Common ground: Libraries and learning. Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators, , 25-21.

13

George, C.. (2006). Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking behavior. Information Research, 11(4), 272-.

14

Gibbons, S.. (2013). Techniques to understand the changing needs of library users. IFLA Journal, 39(2), 162-167.

15

Given, L.. (2003). “Sweeping” the library: Mapping the social activity space of the public library. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 365-385.

16

Halbert, M.. (2010). The information commons : A platform for innovation. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 67-74.

17

Hartmann. E.. (2001). Understanding of information literacy: The perception of first year undergraduate students at the University of Ballarnt. Austrailian Academic and Research Libraries, 32(2), 110-122.

18

Hiller, S.. (2002). How differenct are they? A comparison by academic area of library use, priorities and information needs at the University of Washington. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 33, -.

19

Lippincott, J. K.. (2006). Learning spaces:Educase.

20

Lippincoat, J. K.. (2010). Information commons : Meeting millennials’ needs. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 27-37.

21

Longhurst, R.. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups, In Key methods in geography:Sage.

22

MacWhinnie, L. A.. (2003). The information commons: The academic library of the future. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 241-257.

23

Malenfant, C.. (2006). The information commons as a collaborative workspace. Reference Services Review, 34(2), 279-286.

24

Mandel, L.. (2010). Toward an understanding of library patron wayfinding: Observing patrons' entry routes in a public library. Library and Information Science Research, 32(2), 116-130.

25

Seal, R.. (2005). The information commons: New pathways to digital resources and knowledge management (67-75). In Proceedings of the 3rd China-U.S. Library Conference.

26

Sommer, B.. (1997). A practical guide to behavioral research : Tools and techniques(4th ed):Oxford University Press.

27

Tongco, M. D. C.. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147-158.

28

Whitchurch, M. J.. (2010). Planning an information commons. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 39-50.

정보관리학회지