바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

학제성과 연구 영향력의 상관관계에 관한 연구: 문헌정보학 분야 학술지를 대상으로

Examining on the Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Research Impact with Analyzing the Journals of Library and Information Science Field

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.4, pp.7-29
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.007
박소윤 (이화여자대학교)
정은경 (이화여자대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

최근 다양한 학문 분야는 대내외적 요인으로 인해 학제적 연구 흐름에 영향을 받고 있는 추세이다. 본 연구는 문헌정보학 분야를 대상으로 학제성과 연구 영향력의 상관관계를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2011년 JCR(Journal Citation Reports)의 학술지 영향력 지수 상위에 해당하는 문헌정보학 학술지 10종을 선정하여 WoS(Web of Science) 인용색인 DB에서 2006년부터 2010년까지 1,873편의 논문의 참고문헌 데이터를 대상으로 분석하였다. 동시인용 네트워크 분석과 선정된 4가지 학제성 지수를 사용하여 문헌정보학 분야의 학제적 구조를 파악하고 학제성과 연구 영향력 사이의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 분석 결과를 통해 문헌정보학의 학제적 구조를 제시하였으며, 학제성 지수 중 매개중심성은 학술지 영향력 지수(5년) 그리고 논문당 영향도(Article Influence Score)와 통계적으로 유의한 상관관계가 있음이 밝혀졌다.

Abstract

As interdisciplinary research has been dominant in various fields, the purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between interdisciplinarity and research impact in the field of Library and Information Science. For a data set, ten journals ranked as the top of 2011 JCR’s in terms of JIF (Journal Impact Factor) were selected. The citation data of 1,873 articles from the ten journals were collected from the WoS during the period from 2006 to 2010. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, as network analysis was conducted to investigate the interdisciplinarity of LIS field, interdisciplinarity indicators, and research impact factors were statistically analyzed. The findings of this study confirmed the interdisciplinary knowledge structure of the LIS field as previous studies identified. More importantly, this study demonstrated that a positive correlation existed between interdisciplinarity represented as betweenness centrality and research impact.

참고문헌

1

김판준. (2009). h-지수 및 변형 지수를 이용한 학술지 영향력 측정 (105-112). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회논문집.

2

김판준. (2010). 학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 269-287.

3

박재신. (2010). 지구적 환경문제 해결을 위한 학술활동과 환경운동 경향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 83-102.

4

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

5

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

6

이재윤. (2008). 연구자의 투고 학술지 현황에 근거한 국내 학문분야 네트워크 분석. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 327-345.

7

이재윤. WNET. (Version 0.

8

이혜영. (2012). 학제성 분석을 위한 학술논문의 주제분야 인용관계 분석연구.

9

임두호. (2010). 학제적 분야의 학술지 관리를 위한 SCIE 저널의 인용분석에 관한 연구 (7-14). 제17회한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

10

정연경. (2012). 국내 기록관리학 분야 학술지에 나타난 학제성 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(2), 7-27.

11

정은경. (2009). 연구자 소속과 연구영역 매핑에 의한 학제성 규명에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 26(1), 147-161.

12

정호연. (2007). 학술지 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 179-200.

13

조선례. (2012). 약학 분야 학술정보서비스를 위한 학술지 동시인용 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 43(1), 159-185.

14

Adams, J.. (2007). Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England : Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research:Evidence, Ltd.

15

Andrés, A.. (2009). Measuring academic research : How to undertake a bibliometric study:Chandos Publishing.

16

Bergstrom C. T.. (2008). The Eigenfactor metrics. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433-11434.

17

Bornmann, L.. (2009). Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals : A comparison of new metrics with the Journal Impact Factor. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 10, 1471-1476.

18

Bradford, S. C.. (1978). Documentation:Crosby Lockwood.

19

Braun, T.. (2006). A hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.

20

Chang, Y. W.. (2012). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : Using three bibliometrics methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22-33.

21

정은경. (2011). Interdisciplinary Collaborations in the Domain of Digital Libraries. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 37-51.

22

Davarpanah, M. R.. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals : Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21-39.

23

Garfield, E.. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93.

24

Herring, S. D.. (1999). The value of interdisciplinarity : A study based on the design of internet search engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(4), 358-365.

25

Huang, M. H.. (2012). A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. Scientometrics, 91(3), 789-803.

26

Huang, M. H.. (2009). A study of indicators for knowledge originality and knowledge generality in library & information science. Journal of Library and Information Science, 35(2), 14-33.

27

Larivière, V.. (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 126-131.

28

Levitt, J. M.. (2008). Is multi-disciplinary research more highly cited? A macro-level study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1973-1984.

29

Levitt, J. M.. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67.

30

Leydesdorff, L.. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.

31

Leydesdorff, L.. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals : Diversity, centrality and citations. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 87-100.

32

Morillo, F.. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.

33

Nisonger, T. E.. (2004). The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries. The Serials Librarian, 47(1), 57-75.

34

Pierce, S. J.. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-279.

35

Qin, J.. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893-916.

36

Rinia, E. J.. (2002). Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics, 53(2), 241-248.

37

Ruiz, F.. (2011). WOS-categories. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/148116192/WOS-categories.

38

Small, H.. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature : A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.

39

Steele W. T.. (2000). The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences : A forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 476-484.

40

Sugimoto, C.. (2009). Proposal and application of the interdisciplinarity borrowing index: Determining the degrees of interdisciplinarity of ILS dissertations (1-6). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

41

Tang, R.. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science (54-63). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

42

Tijssen, R. J. W.. (2003). Bibliometric analyses of world science, Extended technical annex to chapter 5 of the ‘Third European Report on S & T Indicators'. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS).

43

Thomson Reuters. (2009). Journal citation reports the JCR Februry 2009 Enhancements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation. http://www.powershow.com/view/144720-MjVjN/Journal_Citation_Reports_the_JCR_February_2009_Enhancements_powerpoint_ppt_presentation.

44

Vanclay, J. K.. (2008). Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 326-334.

45

White, H. D.. (1998). Visualizing a discipline : An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.

46

Yegros-Yegros, A.. (2011). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher scientific impact? A research group based analysis (-). Paper presented at the Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2011.

정보관리학회지