바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the "Kor-<sub>T</sub>", a Modified Tapered h-index, by Applying the Ranking According to the Number of Citations of Journals in Evaluating Korean Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.4, pp.111-131
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111



& (2013). A Study on the "Kor-<sub>T</sub>", a Modified Tapered h-index, by Applying the Ranking According to the Number of Citations of Journals in Evaluating Korean Journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 111-131, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study describes the meaning of and the formula for Kor-hT, which is a modified index built on the tapered h-index by applying ‘the ranking according to the number of citations of journals’. This study evaluated the de-duplication rate of index values of Kor-hT and analyzed the change in the correlation between the index values and evaluation elements using the Korea Citation Index data from 2008 to 2010. Kor-hT is compared with h-index, tapered h-index, and IF. As a result, Kor-hT appeared to be superior to other indexes on de-duplication rate. It is also shown that there is a very strong positive correlation between the evaluation elements, the number of citations and the number of articles of journals, and the index values of Kor-hT.

keywords
KCI, tapered h-index, Kor-hT, Kor-Factor, citation rate ranking, de-duplication, 한국학술지인용색인, tapered h-index, Kor-hT, Kor-Factor, 피인용횟수 순위, 중복제거

Reference

1.

고영만. (2012). 한국 학술지 평가를 위한 KCI 기반 복합지표의 지수 값과 질적․양적 평가요소 사이의 연관성 및 학술지 등재 상태 구별 능력에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(2), 245-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.245.

2.

고영만. (2012). 국내 연구 환경에 적합한 KCI 기반 학술지 복합인용지표 개발 및 연구업적평가 적용방안 연구. 한국연구재단.

3.

김판준. (2010). 학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 269-287.

4.

이재윤. (2012). 계량서지적 평가지표(R&D Activities). 한국연구재단.

5.

조은성. (2011). 국내외 마케팅 학술지의 영향력: Kor-Factor와 Impact Factor의 문제점을 중심으로. 마케팅관리연구, 16(2), 53-82.

6.

홍종선. (2007). KCI 기반 Kor-Factor(Korea Factor)평가지표 개발 및 시범적용. 한국학술진흥재단.

7.

Alonso, S.. (2010). hg-index : A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400.

8.

Anderson, T. R.. (2008). Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 76(3), 577-588.

9.

Batista, P. D.. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.

10.

Braun, T.. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.

11.

Egghe, L.. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.

12.

Garfield, E.. (2006). The history and meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93.

13.

Hirsch, J. E.. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (16569-16572). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

14.

Jin, B.. (2006). h-index : An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8-9.

15.

Jin, B.. (2007). The AR-index : Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 3(1), 6-.

16.

Jin, B.. (2007). The R-and AR-indices : Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855-863.

17.

Ko, Y. M.. (2011). A study on the optimization of KCI-based index(Kor-Factor)in evaluating Korean journals. Scientometrics, 88(1), 61-71.

18.

Tol, R. S. J.. (2009). The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics, 80(2), 317-324.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy