바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

정보행태 연구 분야에서 협동적 정보행태 모형의 비교·분석 연구

A Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Information Behavior Models in Information Behavior Research

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.3, pp.183-205
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.183
이지수 (노스텍사스대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

협동적 정보행태에 대한 연구의 중요성이 대두됨에 따라, 다양한 문제 상황에서 협동적 정보행태에 대한 많은 수의 연구가 수행되어 왔고, 그를 바탕으로 여러 모형이 제안되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 Prekop(2002), Reddy와 Jansen(2008), Shah(2008), Karunakaran, Spence와 Reddy(2010), Yue와 He(2010) 등이 제안한 5개의 협동적 정보행태 모형들을 비교 분석하고, 그 결과를 토대로 향후 협동적 정보행태 연구의 지향점을 논의하였다. 협동적 정보행태에 대한 기존 연구의 한계를 극복하고 후속 연구를 위한 전략은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 다양한 이용자 그룹 및 문제 상황에 따른 협동적 정보행태의 연구가 요구되며, 둘째, 협동적 정보행태에서 나타나는 다양하고 복잡한 측면을 다루는 총체적인 연구의 접근이 필요하고, 셋째, 제안된 협동적 정보행태 모형에 대한 논의와 일반화의 검증이 필요하다. 특히, 국내외 환경을 반영한 경험적 연구를 바탕으로 제안된 모형이 수정․보완되어야 할 것이다.

Abstract

A number of studies and models have focused on collaborative information behavior (CIB) in various contexts as the importance of research on CIB is recognized in information behavior research. This study compared and analyzed the models of CIB developed by Prekop (2002), Reddy and Jansen (2008), Shah (2008), Karunakaran, Spence and Reddy (2010), and Yue and He (2010), and discussed the direction of future studies of CIB. The future research strategies for overcoming the limitation of previous studies and models on CIB are to extend research object and context, to do holistic research approach tracing complexity of CIB, and to debate and verify the models of CIB. In particular, it needs to modify and improve the models based on the empirical research for domestic context.

참고문헌

1

김갑선. (2005). 정보추구행태 모형의 연구 경향. 정보관리학회지, 22(4), 235-254.

2

김성진. (2004). 웹 정보탐색행위 모형의 비교 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 21(2), 211-234.

3

김성진. (2005). 정보기술 전문가와 이용자의 인지이동에 기반한 협력적 문제해결 행위 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(1), 209-228.

4

사공복희. (2003). 정보추구행태모형의 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(1), 93-119.

5

Bonner, M.. (1998). Information behaviour: A preliminary investigation (68-79). Proceedings of IRMA 1998, Effective utilisation and management of emergent technologies. Idea Group Publishing.

6

Borden, L.. (1999). Assessing your collaboration : A self evaluation tool. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 67-72.

7

Bruce, H.. (2003). A comparison of the collaborative information retrieval of two design teams. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 4, 139-153.

8

Chrislip, D.. (1994). Collaborative leadership:Jossey-Bass.

9

Ellis, D.. (1989). A behavioural model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4), 237-247.

10

Foley, C.. (2010). Division of labour and sharing of knowledge for synchronous collaborative information retrieval. Information. Processing and Management, 46(6), 762-772.

11

Foster, J.. (2006). Collaborative information seeking and retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 329-356.

12

Frey, B. B.. (2004). Measuring change in collaboration among school safety partners (63-72). Proceedings of the National Conference of the Hamilton Fish Institute on School and Community Violence. George Washington University.

13

Gray, B.. (1989). Collaborating : Finding common ground for multiparty problems:Jossey-Bass.

14

Hartley, P.. (1997). Group communication:Routledge.

15

Hertzum, M.. (2008). Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 957-962.

16

Hogue, T.. (1993). Community-based collaboration : Community wellness multiplied:Oregon State University, Oregon Center for Community Leadership.

17

Kelly, R.. (2013). Division of labour in collaborative information seeking: Current approaches and future directions (-). Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Collaborative Information Seeking.

18

Karunakaran, A.. (2010). Towards a model of collaborative information behavior (-). ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

19

Krikelas, J.. (1983). Information-seeking behavior : Patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2), 5-20.

20

Kuhlthau, C. C.. (1993). Implementing a process approach to information skills : A study identifying indicators of success in library media programs. School Library Media Quarterly, 22(1), 11-18.

21

Marchionini, G.. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments:Cambridge University Press.

22

Mattessich, P. W.. (1992). Collaboration : What makes it work:Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

23

Morris, M. R.. (2007). SearchTogether: An interface for collaborative web search (3-12). Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’07).

24

Palmer, J.. (1991). Scientists and information : Using cluster analysis to identify information style. Journal of Documentation, 47(2), 105-129.

25

Paul, S.. (2010). framework for sensemaking in collaborative information seeking (-). Position paper at the 2nd International Workshop on Collaborative Information Seeking at CSCW 2010.

26

Poltrock, S.. (2003). Information seeking and sharing in design teams (239-247). Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork.

27

Prekop, P.. (2002). A qualitative study of collaborative information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 533-547.

28

Reddy, M. C.. (2008). A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams. Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 256-273.

29

Roschelle, J.. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving, In Computer supported collaborative Learning:Springer-Verlag.

30

Shah, C.. (2008). Toward collaborative information seeking(CIS) (-). Proceedings of Collaborative Exploratory Search workshop at JCDL.

31

Shen, L.. (2010). Study on collaborative information seeking behavior for academic information in Web 2.0 Environment (-). Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Symposium on Information Engineering and Electronic Commerce (IEEC).

32

Sonnenwald, D. H.. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40(6), 643-681.

33

Ying Sun. (2012). A Comparison of Information Researchers’ Attitude for Collaboration in General and Collaboration in Web 2.0. Journal of Human Subjectivity, 10(2), 65-82.

34

Talja, S.. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities : Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of information Behavior Research, 3, 143-159.

35

Talja, S.. (2006). Information sharing, In New Directions in Human Information Behavior:Springer.

36

Twidale, M. B.. (1996). Collaborative browsing and visualisation of the search process (177-182). Aslib Proceedings.

37

Wilson, T. D.. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.

38

Yue, Z.. (2010). Exploring collaborative information behavior in context: A case study of E-discovery (-). Paper presented at the ACM 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

39

Zhao, J.. (2001). Modeling and system design for Web-based collaborative learning (-). Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

정보관리학회지