바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

저자동시인용 분석과 동시출현단어 분석을 이용한 의료정보학 저널의 지적구조 분석

Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.2, pp.207-225
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207
허고은 (연세대학교)
송민 (연세대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

학문과 기술의 발달이 전개되면서 학문 간의 융합이 이루어지고 학제적 성향을 띠는 학문이 더욱 등장하게 되었다. 현재까지 계량정보학적 방법으로 학문 분야의 지적구조를 파악한 연구는 있었지만 학제적인 학문의 특성을 규명하여 지적구조를 분석한 시도는 적었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 학제성을 띠는 의료정보학(Medical Informatics) 분야의 저널 중 IEEE ENG MED BIOL 저널을 선정하여 저자동시인용 분석과 동시출현단어 분석을 통해 본 저널의 지적구조를 파악하였다. 또한 상위 3개 대표 저널의 저자 및 MeSH Term을 추출하여 종합적으로 비교분석하였다. 이를 통해 의료정보학 분야의 융합된 학문들의 관계를 구조적으로 파악하고 의료정보학의 학문적 성향을 분석했다.

Abstract

Due to the development of science and technology, the convergence of various disciplines has been fostered. Accordingly, interdisciplinary studies have increasingly been expanded by integrating knowledge and methodology from different disciplines. The primary focus of biblimetric methods is on investigating the intellectual structure a field, and analysis of the characterization of interdisciplinary studies is overlooked. In this study, we aim to identify the intellectual structure of the field of medical informatics through author co-citation analysis and co-word analysis by the representative journal “IEEE ENG MED BIOL.” In addition, we examine authors and MeSH Terms of top three representative journals for further analysis of the field. We examine the intellectual structure of the medical informatics field by author and word clusters to identify the network structure of medical informatics disciplines.

참고문헌

1

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

2

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

3

정호연. (2007). 학술지 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 179-200.

4

Acedo, F. J.. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14(5), 619-639.

5

An, X. Y.. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133-144.

6

Callon, M.. (1986). Mapping of the dynamics of science and technology:Macmillan.

7

Cambrosio, A.. (1993). Historical scientometrics? : Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 27(2), 119-143.

8

DeShazo, J. P.. (2009). Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of “Medical Informatics" in MeSH. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9(7), 1-13.

9

Haux, R.. (2010). Medical informatics : Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(9), 599-610.

10

Grassberger, P.. (1983). Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D : Nonlinear Phenomena, 9(1), 189-208.

11

He, Q.. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-159.

12

Kenefick, C.. (2011). Bibliometric study of medical reference services quarterly, 1982-2009. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(1), 1-11.

13

Klein, J. T.. (1998). Advancing interdisciplinary studies, In Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature:College Entrance Examination Board.

14

Leydesdorff, L.. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.

15

Liang, H. N.. (2010). Overview of the health informatics research field: A bibliometric approach (37-48). Proceedings of the First IMIA/IFIP Joint Symposium on E-Health. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

16

Liu, G. Y.. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217.

17

Malin, B.. (2007). A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(3), 340-348.

18

Milojević, S.. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science : Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933-1953.

19

Morillo, F.. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.

20

Morris, T. A.. (1998). The structure of medical informatics journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(5), 448-466.

21

Nerur, S. P.. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field : An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.

22

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD). Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.

23

Rip, A.. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology : An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381-400.

24

Schuemle, M. J.. (2009). Mapping the domain of medical informatics. Methods of Information in Medicine, 48(1), 76-83.

25

Schvaneveldt, R. W.. (1990). Pathfinder Associative Networks : Studies in Knowledge Organization:Ablex.

26

Small, H. G.. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature : A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.

27

Theiler, J.. (1987). Efficient algorithm for estimating the correlation dimension from a set of discrete points. Physical Review A, 36(9), 4456-4462.

28

Uzun, A.. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries : A brief bibliometric perspective. International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 21-33.

29

Van Bemmel, J. H.. (1984). The structure of medical informatics. Medical Informatics, 9(3), 175-180.

30

Van Bemmel, J. H.. (1997). Handbook of medical informatics:Springer-Verlag.

31

White, H. D.. (1981). Author cocitation : A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.

32

Zhao, L. M.. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994-2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 51-87.

33

Zong, Q. J.. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781-799.

정보관리학회지