바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Analyzing Faceted Navigations of OPAC in Korean University Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.2, pp.189-205
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.189

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This research analyzed how the main requisites of faceted navigation as names of facets, subterms of facets, order of facets, too many results were user-centric. On the research method, this research analyzed the results of the three keywords retrieved in the 15 university libraries’ catalogs and how was user’s familiarity to the terms. Although domestic universities have serviced facet navigation, the names of the facet of publication date and series title in format and the terms under the facets as multimedia and nonbook material, media material are too difficult intuitively to understand and there were lots of formal terms used in cataloging rules and the terms librarians have usually used. Because of the terms, there is high possibility to deteriorate users’ satisfaction and usability to library catalog in future. Even though they serviced facet navigation, there was also weakness as too many results and the university libraries need to use relevance ranking method to solve the weakness. This research has found the possibility of being used too many of levels of the facets and this may also badly affect the users’ experience to library catalog.

keywords
next-generation catalog, facet navigation, user interface, integrated search, user experience, 차세대목록, 패싯 내비게이션, 이용자 인터페이스, 통합 검색, 이용자 경험

Reference

1.

구중억. (2007). 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 61-88.

2.

박지영. (2012). KDC 조기표를 이용한 국내서의 패싯 내비게이션 기능 개선 방안. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(1), 47-63.

3.

심경. (2008). 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 : AquaBrowser. 도서관문화, 49(10), 48-56.

4.

심경. (2008). 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례(2) : WorldCat Local. 도서관문화, 49(11), 54-61.

5.

유영준. (2011). 차세대 도서관 목록에서의 패싯 내비게이션에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(3), 13-30.

6.

윤정옥. (2010). 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(1), 5-28.

7.

Antelman, K.. (2006). Toward a twenty-first century library catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 128-139.

8.

Bowen, J.. (2008). Metadata to support next-generation library resource discovery : Lessons form the eXtensible catalog, phase 1. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(2), 6-19.

9.

Breeding, M.. (2010). Next-Gen Library Catalogs:Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.

10.

Emanuel, J.. (2011). Usability of the VuFind next-generation online catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 30(1), 44-52.

11.

OCLC. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC membership. http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm.

12.

OCLC. (2006). College students’ perceptions of libraries and information resources. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/pdfs/studentperceptions.pdf.

13.

Sadeh, T.. (2008). User experience in the library: A case study. New Library World, 109(1), 7-24.

14.

Graham, T.. (2012). Rethinking library web sites with user experience design: Conference report. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(1), 53-54.

15.

University of California. (2005). Libraries bibliographic services task force: Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California. http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf.

16.

Yang, S. Q.. (2010). The next generation library catalog : A comparative study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3), 141-150.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management