바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on the Development of a University-based Institutional Repository Operational Model for Scholarly Information Distribution

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.1, pp.93-109
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.093

(2013). A Study on the Development of a University-based Institutional Repository Operational Model for Scholarly Information Distribution. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 93-109, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.093
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study extracted quality control factors for invigorating Institutional Repository operations, and re-extracted key quality control factors with significant influence among them. Furthermore, this study developed an operating model reflecting an improvement scheme of these key quality control factors, and estimated how much effective the operating model was to the user. As a result of inspecting satisfaction for IR operating model and the general system, it has been found that librarians’ satisfaction for them is higher than that of the general user. Korea’s universities prefer a proxy submission mode by librarians to a self-archiving submission mode by writers. Therefore, based on the operation model developed by this study, it is suggested that Institutional Repository operation can be actively invigorated with librarians of these universities as central players.

keywords
오픈액세스, 기관 레포지터리, 라이선스관리시스템, 만족도, 셀프 아카이빙, open access, institutional repository, license management system, satisfaction, self-archiving, open access, institutional repository, license management system, satisfaction, self-archiving

Reference

1.

김현희. (2005). 국가지식정보 유통체제 마련을 위한 평가모형 및 표준업무 모델 개발 연구. 한국교육학술정보원.

2.

김현희. (2006). 대학 기관 리포지토리의 운영 현황 분석 및 개선 방안에 관한 연구: dCollection을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 17-39.

3.

정경희. (2010). 대학의 오픈액세스 정책 수립시 구성요소에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(2), 229-250.

4.

정영미. (2010). 성공적인 리포지터리의 운영정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(4), 131-152.

5.

황혜경. (2009). 오픈액세스기반 기관리포지터리 성공에 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 26(4), 35-57.

6.

Abrizah, A.. (2010). Piloting an institutional repository at a research-intensive university : Strategies for content recruitment and the role of the library. World Digital Libraries, 3(1), 23-29.

7.

Chan, L.. (2004). Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age : The role of open-access institutional repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29, 277-300.

8.

Covey, D. T.. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles : A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. portal : Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 223-251.

9.

Creaser, C.. (2010). Open access to research outputs—institutional policies and researchers' views: Results from two complementary surveys. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(1), 4-25.

10.

Foster, N. F.. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1), -.

11.

Jones, R. A. T.. (2006). The institutional repository:Chandos Publishing.

12.

Kim, J.. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246-254.

13.

Kingsley, D.. (2008). The institutional/disciplinary divide, a barrier to open access. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/46793.

14.

Markey, K.. (2009). Secrets of success: Identifying success factors in institutional repositories (-). Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Open Repositories.

15.

Shearer, K.. (2003). Institutional repositories : Toward the identification of critical success factors. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27(3), 89-108.

16.

Swan, A.. (2005). Open access self-archiving : An author study:JISC.

17.

Watson, S.. (2007). Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 20(3), 225-230.

18.

Westell, M.. (2006). Institutional repositories : Proposed indicators of success. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 211-226.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy