바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

계량정보학분야의 협력연구 네트워크 및 문헌네트워크 분석 : 국가, 기관, 문헌단위 분석

Collaboration Networks and Document Networks in Informetrics Research from 2001 to 2011: Finding Influential Nations, Institutions, Documents

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.1, pp.179-191
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
이재윤 (명지대학교)
최상희 (대구가톨릭대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Since information scientists have begun trying to quantify significant research trends in scientific publications, ‘-metrics’ research such as ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘informetrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis’ have been identified as crucial areas of information science. To illustrate the dynamic research activities in these areas, this study investigated the major contributors of ‘-metrics’ research for the last decade at three levels: nations, institutions, and documents. ‘-metrics’ literature of this study was obtained from the Science Citation Index for the years 2001-2011. In this analysis, we used Pathfinder network, PNNC algorithm, PageRank and several indicators based on h-index. In terms of international collaborations, USA and England were identified as major countries. At the institutional level, Katholieke University, Leuven and the University of Amsterdam in Europe and Indiana University and the Office of Naval Research in the USA have led co-research projects in informetrics areas. At the document level, Hirsch’s h-index paper and Ingwersen’s web impact factor paper were identified as the most influential work by two methods: PageRank and single paper h-index.

참고문헌

1

Brin, S.. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1), 107-117.

2

Brookes, B. C.. (1990). Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics??? What are we talking about?, In Informetrics 89/90: Selection of papers submitted for the second international conference on bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics:Elsevier.

3

De Nooy, W.. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek(2nd ed.):Cambridge University Press.

4

Garfield, E. E.. (1955). Citation indexes for science : A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.

5

Hood, W. W.. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314.

6

Kim, H.. (2008). Exploring the emerging intellectual structure of archival studies using text mining : 2001-2004. Journal of Information Science, 34(3), 356-369.

7

이재윤. (2006). 연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 167-186.

8

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

9

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

10

Lee, J. Y.. (2010). A bibliometric analysis on LED research trends. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT).

11

이재윤. (2011). 인용 네트워크 분석에 근거한 문헌 인용 지수 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 119-143.

12

Lee, J. Y.. WNET. (Version 0.4) (Software).

13

이재윤. (2011). Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 11-36.

14

Schubert, A.. (2009). Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, 78(3), 559-565.

15

Wouters, P.. (1999). The citation culture.

정보관리학회지