바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.4
Citation Share

Ego-centered Topic Citation Analysis on Folksonomy Research Documents

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2012, v.29 no.4, pp.295-312
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.295

(2012). Ego-centered Topic Citation Analysis on Folksonomy Research Documents. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(4), 295-312, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.4.295
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This research aims to present the ego-centered topic citation analysis, which is a new application of White’s ego-centered citation analysis, for analyzing multilayered knowledge structure of a subject domain. An experimental topic citation analysis was carried out on the folksonomy research documents retrieved from Web of Science. Ego-centered topic citation analyses on folksonomy research domain were conducted in three stages: ego-documents set analysis, topic citation identity analysis, and topic citation image analysis. The results showed that the ego-centered topic citation analysis suggested in this study was successfully performed to illustrate the inner and the outer knowledge structures of folksonomy research domain.

keywords
ego-centered citation analysis, topic citation analysis, research domain analysis, intellectual structure analysis, folksonomy, citation identity, citation image, 자아중심 인용분석, 주제 인용분석, 연구영역 분석, 지적구조 분석, 폭소노미, 인용정체성, 인용이미지, ego-centered citation analysis, topic citation analysis, research domain analysis, intellectual structure analysis, folksonomy, citation identity, citation image

Reference

1.

김판준. (2010). 학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 269-287.

2.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 333-355.

3.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

4.

이재윤. WNET. (Version 0.4) (Software).

5.

이재윤. (2012). 자기 인용 네트워크와 인용 정체성을 이용한 연구자의 연구 이력 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.157.

6.

Banks, M. G.. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch Index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161-168.

7.

Braun, T.. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22), 8-.

8.

Kessler, M. M.. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.

9.

이재윤. (2011). Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 11-36.

10.

Small, H.. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. , -.

11.

Tsay, Ming-yueh. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998-2008. Scientometrics, 89(2), 591-606.

12.

White, H. D.. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis, In The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield:Information Today, Inc.

13.

White, H. D.. (1981). Author cocitation : A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.

14.

Yanping, L.. (2011). Research on the journal-based citation identity and citation image. Information Studies : Theory & Application, , -.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy