바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.3
Citation Share

Influences of Enneagram Personality Types on OPAC Searching and Satisfaction

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2012, v.29 no.3, pp.169-186
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.169

(2012). Influences of Enneagram Personality Types on OPAC Searching and Satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3), 169-186, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.169
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study examined the relation between personality types and users' searching trait and satisfaction when interacting with OPAC system. In this study, personality type was measured by the KEPTI Enneagram tools. Data was collected through four questionnaires, pre-test, TaskA, TaskB, and post-test survey. The results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in perceptions on the expected ease of search, completion time, adequacy of search time, usefulness of search results, and performed ease of search within the Three Triads of Enneagram. Also a statistically significant difference was found on familiarity and interest in the selected queries within the Hornivian group.

keywords
searching trait, enneagram, OPAC, personality types, user study, 탐색 성향, 에니어그램, OPAC, 성격 유형, 이용자 연구, searching trait, enneagram, OPAC, personality types, user study

Reference

1.

구중억. (2007). 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 61-88.

2.

권용주. (2006). 에니어그램과 여행동기의 상관관계 (47-60). 제60차 한국관광학회 학술대회논문집.

3.

김희섭. (2004). Web OPAC 이용패턴과 MBTI 성격유형의 상관관계. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 35(4), 229-250.

4.

반경진. (2007). 사용자 맞춤형 인터페이스가 몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 인포디자인이슈, 11, 31-42.

5.

사공복희. (2003). 웹기반 온라인 목록의 이용행태 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 81-110.

6.

서은경. (2000). OPAC의 기능성 및 인터페이스 유용성 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 17(4), 187-206.

7.

이은철. (1999). 대학도서관 Web OPAC 서지정보 인터페이스에 관한 연구 (117-120). 한국정보관리학회.

8.

윤운성. (2003). 한국형 에니어그램 검사의 해석과 활용. 한국에니어그램교육연구소.

9.

이두이. (2008). 전문대학도서관 사서의 성격유형과 직무만족도에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 39(3), 119-137.

10.

이제환. (1998). OPAC 이용자 인터페이스의 품질 평가 : SOLARS를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(1), 69-96.

11.

정희정. (2006). 대학생의 에니어그램 성격유형별 자기표현과 촉진적 의사소통에 관한 연구. 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 17(4), 163-173.

12.

Babu, B. R.. (2000). Web OPAC interfaces : An overview. The Electronic Library, 18(5), 316-327.

13.

Bellardo, T.. (1985). An investigation of online searcher traits and their relationship to search outcome. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 241-250.

14.

Chisman, J.. (1999). Usability testing : A case study. College & Research Libraries, 60(6), 552-569.

15.

Heinstrӧm, J.. (2003). Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour. Information Research, 9(1), -.

16.

Kani-Zabihi, E.. (2008). User perceptions of online public library catalogues. International Journal of Information Management, 28(6), 492-502.

17.

Mi, J.. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC : Interface, searching, and display challenges. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 5-22.

18.

Saracevic, T.. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. Ⅲ : Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 197-216.

19.

Wilson, T. D.. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.

20.

Zhang, Xiangmin. (2005). An empirical testing of user stereotypes of information retrieval systems. Information Processing and Management, 41(3), 651-664.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy