바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Domain Analysis on Economics by Utilizing Cocitation Analysis of Multiple Authorship

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2012, v.29 no.1, pp.115-134
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.1.115


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The author co-citation analysis is generally based on the frequency of the first author because most citation databases include only the first author in the bibliographic information. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to provide a better knowledge structure by utilizing the multiple authorship of author co-citation analysis. To achieve the purpose of this study, four different data sets are prepared: (1) counting the first author, (2) counting all the author without limiting the total frequency, (3) counting all the author with limiting the total frequency, and (4) counting adjusted frequencies based on the order of author subscription. The findings of this study show that there are clear differences between the knowledge structure counting all the author and the one counting only the first author. In addition, depending on the different methods, there are subtle changes of cluster members for authors.

keywords
저자동시인용분석, 복수저자, 경제학, author co-citation analysis, multiple authorship, economics, domain analysis, author co-citation analysis, multiple authorship, economics, domain analysis

Reference

1.

김도미. (1993). 저자동시인용 분석과 인용한 문헌의 색인어 분석에 의한 지적 구조의 규명. 정보관리연구, 24(1), 32-57.

2.

김영진. (1986). 논문의 동시인용을 통한 지적구조의 규명에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 3(1), 103-135.

3.

김희전. (2010). 저자동시인용분석과 저자서지결합분석에 의한 지적 구조 분석: 사회복지학 분야를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 283-306.

4.

閔鈗京. (1992). 저자동시인용분석에 의한 경영학 분야의 지적구조 규명에 관한 연구.

5.

유종덕. (2011). 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 123-144.

6.

이종욱. (2011). 교수연구업적 평가법의 계량적 분석: 국내 문헌정보학과 교수연구업적을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 119-140.

7.

이은숙. (2002). 복수저자를 고려한 동시인용분석 연구: 정보학과 컴퓨터과학을 대상으로. 지식처리연구, 3(2), 1-26.

8.

이재윤. (2007). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 MDS 지도 작성 방식의 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 335-357.

9.

Bayer, A. E.. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444-452.

10.

Blaug, M.. (2003). Who's Who in Economics(4th ed.):Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

11.

Eom, S.. (2008). All author cocitation analysis and first author cocitation analysis : A comparative empirical investigation. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 53-64.

12.

Fletcher, J.. (1972). A view of the literature of economics. Journal of Documentation, 28(4), 283-294.

13.

Howard, G. S.. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of American Psychology Association. American Psychologist, 42(11), 975-986.

14.

Laband, David N.. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632-662.

15.

McCain, K.. (1983). The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics, 5(5), 277-289.

16.

McCain, K. W.. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping : The changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(6), 351-359.

17.

McCain, K. W.. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122.

18.

McCain, K. W.. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space : A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.

19.

Nerur, S. P.. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field : an author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.

20.

Paisley, W.. (1990). An oasis where many trails cross : The improbable cocitation networks of a multidiscipline. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 459-468.

21.

Persson, O.. (2001). All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, 50(2), 339-344.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management