바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

연구 성과평가와 연구정보서비스의 연계를 위한 기초 연구: 과학기술 분야 연구개발사업을 중심으로

A Study on Framework for Linkage of Research Performance Evaluation and Research Information Service

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.4, pp.243-261
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.243
김판준 (신라대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

국가적 차원의 연구 성과평가와 연구정보서비스의 연계를 위한 프레임워크를 메타데이터 표현과 교환의 두 가지 측면에서 모색하였다. 이를 위해 과학기술분야 연구개발사업을 대상으로 국가적 차원의 연구 성과평가 메타데이터의 기능적 요건을 도출하였고, 이에 기초하여 주요 기능별로 국제적인 표준의 적용 방안을 제안하였다. 또한 웹 아키텍처 상에서 연구정보를 재사용 및 교환할 수 있는 국제표준으로서 OAI-ORE에 기반하여 성과평가 메타데이터를 표현 및 연계하기 위한 구현 방안과 사례를 제시하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate a framework for linkage of national research performance evaluation and research information service from the perspective of metadata representation and exchange. Based on results of the functional requirements for metadata of national research performance evaluation are derived, this study suggests strategies for the application of international metadata standards. Also, this study presents an method to implement the metadata of research performance evaluation based on OAI-ORE, which is an international standard that can reuse and exchange the research information on web architecture.

참고문헌

1

기획재정부. (2010). e-나라지표. 정부 연구개발(R&D) 예산, 지표 상세화면. http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=1330.

2

기획재정부. (2011). 2011년도 국가연구개발사업 자체평가 지침(안):기획재정부.

3

김상현. (1991). 객관적 R & D결과, 평가기법 개발연구:한국에너지기술연구원.

4

김판준. (2010). 연구정보를 위한 보존 메타데이터 요소 개발에 관한 연구: 경제․인문사회연구회 연구관리시스템을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 27(4), 169-191.

5

교육과학기술부. (2011). 교육과학기술부 소관 연구개발사업 성과관리업무 매뉴얼(안):교육과학기술부.

6

남영광. (2005). ISO/IEC 11179에 따른 산업기술정보 메타데이터 표준화. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 36(1), 57-75.

7

최태진. (2007). 국가연구개발사업의 유형별 성과분석을 통한 전략적 연구관리 체계 구축에 관한 연구.

8

황의인. (2004). 특정연구개발사업 특허 등 연구성과의 체계적 관리방안에 관한 연구. 과학기술부.

9

Caplan, P. (2003). Metadata Fundamentals for all Librarians:ALA.

10

Caplan, P. (2009). Understanding PREMIS. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/understanding-premis.pdf.

11

Cohen, Wesley M. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.

12

Day, M. Institutional repositories and research assessment. Project Report. UKOLN, University of Bath. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/23308/1/eprintsuk-rae-study.pdf.

13

Day, M. Models for integrating institutional repositories and research information management systems. Position paper for the Workshop on CRIS, CERIF and Institutional Repositories, CNR, Rome, 10-11 May 2010. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/rim/dissemination/2010/day-position-paper.pdf.

14

euroCRIS. (2010). CERIF 2008-1.1 FDM: Model Introduction and Specification. http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF2008/CERIF2008_1.1_FDM.pdf.

15

Hodge, G. Metadata Made Simpler. NISO Press. http://www.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in/raja/is214/214-2001-2002/Metadata_Bklt.pdf.

16

JISC. (2010). Research Information Management: Towards a common standard for exchanging research information. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/briefingpapers/2010/bpexriv1.aspx#downloads.

17

Key Perspectives Ltd. (2009). A Comparative Review of Research Assessment Regimes in Five Countries and the Role of Libraries in the Research Assessment Process. Report commissioned by OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2009/2009-09.pdf.

18

Lagoze, Carol. (2008a). Robert Sanderson, and Pete Johnston. 2008a. Object Re-Use & Exchange: A Resource-Centric Approach. arXiv:0804.2273v1. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0804/0804.2273.pdf.

19

Lagoze, Carol. (2011). ORE Specification-Abstract Data Model. http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel.

20

Lagoze, Carol. (2008c). ORE User Guide-Primer. http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/primer.html.

21

MacColl, John. (2010). Research Assessment and the Role of the Library. Report produced by OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-01.pdf.

22

NISO. Understanding Metadata. NISO Press. http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf.

23

Open Archives Initiative. http://www.openarchives.org.

24

Pepe, A. (2010). From artifacts to aggregations: Modelling scientific life cycles on the Semantic Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 567-582.

25

PREMIS Working Group. (2005). Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprojects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf.

26

Rogers, N.. Exchanging Research Information in the UK. http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/448/1/exri_final_v2.pdf.

27

UKOLN. (2010). Research Information Management in the UK: CERIF and metadata alignment. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/rim/dissemination/2010/rim-cerif.pdf.

28

Van de Sompel, H. (2007). Open Archives Initiative Object Re-Use & Exchange. http://elag2007.upf.edu/papers/sompel.pdf.

29

Van de Sompel, H. (2009). Adding eScience Assets to the Data Web. Proceedings of Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2009) Workshop. http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/papers/ldow2009_paper8.pdf.

정보관리학회지