바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.4
Citation Share

Construction of Folksonomy-Based Microcontents Using Upper Ontology Modeling

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.4, pp.161-182
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.161

(2011). Construction of Folksonomy-Based Microcontents Using Upper Ontology Modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 161-182, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.161
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Metadata and folksonomy are two main approaches in representing, organizing, and retrieving resources in the current information environment. Many researches have conducted studies to combine of metadata and folksonomy in order to utilize the strengths of both approaches. This research proposed an approach to utilize both metadata and folksonomy in representing resources by using microcontents. Microcontents in this research is a conceptual structure that reflects dynamic characteristics of folksonomy and the structure of metadata. By connecting folksonomy with metadata through this microcontents structure, both approaches can maximize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses in representing, organizing, and retrieving resources.

keywords
folksonomy, metadata, upper ontology modeling, microcontents, folksonomy, metadata, upper ontology modeling, microcontents, 폭소노미, 메타데이터, 상위온톨로지 모델링, 마이크로컨텐츠

Reference

1.

김동숙. (2010). 저작관련 요소분석을 통한 폭소노미 태그의 활용방안에 관한 연구: LibraryThing을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 41-60.

2.

이성숙. (2008). 대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 463-480.

3.

Bates, M. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185-12085.

4.

Golder, S.. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208.

5.

Hammond, T. (2005). Social bookmarking tools(I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html.

6.

Hidderley, R. (1997). Democratic indexing: An approach to the retrieval of fiction. Information Services & Use, 17(2), 101-109.

7.

Kroski, E. (2005). The hive mind: Folksonomies and user-based tagging. http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user-based-tagging.

8.

Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.

9.

Merholz, P. Metadata for the masses. http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000361.php.

10.

Nielsen, J. Microcontent: How to write headlines, page titles, and subject lines. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980906.html.

11.

Shih. (2008). Folksonomy-based indexing for location-aware retrieval of learning contents (143-147). Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, Beijing, China.

12.

Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology iss overrated: Categories, links, and tags. http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.

13.

Veltman, K. H. (2004). Towards a semantic web for culture. Journal of Digital Information, 4, -.

14.

Weller, K. (2007). Folksonomies and ontologies: Two new players in indexing and knowledge representation (108-115). Proceedings of Online Information 2007, London, Great Britain.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy