바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.4
Citation Share

A Bibliometric Analysis of Faculty Research Performance Assessment Methods

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.4, pp.119-140
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119


& (2011). A Bibliometric Analysis of Faculty Research Performance Assessment Methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 119-140, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Effective assessment of faculty research performance should involve considerations of both quality and quantity of faculty research. This study analyzed methods for evaluating faculty research output by comparing the rankings of Library and Information Science(LIS) faculty by publication counts, citation counts, and research performance assessment guidelines employed by Korean universities. The study results indicated that faculty rankings based on publication counts to be significantly different from those based on citation counts. Additionally, faculty rankings measured by university guidelines showed bigger correlations with rankings based on publication counts than rankings by citation counts, while differences in universities guidelines did not significantly affect the faculty rankings. The study findings suggest the need for bibliometric indicators that reflect the quality as well as the quantity of research output.

keywords
계량서지학, 계량분석, 연구업적, 교수업적평가, 문헌정보학, bibliometrics, bibliometric analysis, research achievement, faculty research assessment, library and information science

Reference

1.

강금식. (2008). EXCEL활용 현대 통계학:박영사.

2.

강대신. (2009). 연구성과의 질적 평가를 위한 계량정보학적 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 26(3), 377-394.

3.

김유선. (2009). 한국 소화기학 연구업적 평가. 대한소화기학회지, 53(2), 131-140.

4.

손정표. (2003). 한국의 문헌정보학분야 연구동향 분석 : 1957~2002. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 34(3), 9-32.

5.

오세훈. (2005). 우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 379-408.

6.

윤희윤. (2005). 학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 36(3), 1-25.

7.

이재윤. (2011). 인용 네트워크 분석에 근거한 문헌 인용 지수 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 119-143.

8.

이종욱. (2011). 한국 문헌정보학 연구의 계량적 분석 - 국내 문헌정보학과 교수 연구업적을 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(4), 53-76.

9.

이혁재. (2006). 연구성과의 질 제고를 위한 논문평가 모형개발. 기술혁신학회지, 9(3), 538-557.

10.

정경희. (1999). 인용분석의 발전과 그에 대한 비판. 정보관리연구, 30(2), 53-68.

11.

정연경. (2011). 연구결과물 성과 측정 산식 개발 및 사업 적용 방안 마련을 위한 연구. 한국연구재단.

12.

정연경. (2011). 인문·사회과학 분야 교수의 연구업적물 평가에 관한 연구. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 211-233.

13.

정진식. (2009). 교수연구업적 평가분석 - 문헌정보학분야를 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(2), 129-142.

14.

정진식. (2000). 한국문헌정보학분야의 연구동향분석: 1996-2000. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(3), 55-78.

15.

조현양. (2003). 인용분석을 통한 웹 자원의 가치 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 225-240.

16.

허선. (2005). KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index)와 KCI(Korea Citation Index)의 2004년도 영향력지표값 비교분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 36(3), 183-193.

17.

Adkins, D. (2006). Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty. Library & Information Science Research, 28, 374-389.

18.

Bornmann, L. (2008). What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.

19.

Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects-an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229.

20.

Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(4), 299-305.

21.

Hayes, R. M. (1983). Citation statistics as a measure of faculty research productivity. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 23(3), 151-172.

22.

Ho, J. C. (2005). A proposed model to evaluate faculty research productivity. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 9(1), 81-97.

23.

Li, J. (2010). Ranking of library and information science researchers: comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 554-563.

24.

Lisee, C. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776-1784.

25.

Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing asian scholarly research in library and information science: a quantitative view as reflected in Web of Knowledge. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90-101.

26.

Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-101.

27.

Toutkoushian, R. K. (2003). Using publications counts to measure an institution's research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 121-148.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy