바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Exploratory Study on the Study Trend of Domestic Entrepreneurship Using Co-word Analysis Method

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.295-312
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.295



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study conducted time-series analysis on domestic studies related to entrepreneurship for more than last 50 years by integrating the co-word analysis method of intellectual structure analysis into the study of entrepreneurship. The co-word analysis method is a quantitative analysis method to analyze the overall trend of the study and further study topics by visualizing the information between study topics and arranging the topics on two-dimensional plane and the study result showed largely four phases and the direction of the study path. According to the analysis, the study is started at embryonic study phase(third quadrant), the study topic of independent study phase(second quadrant) is a phase to be a settled independent area as a study and the topics of the study include topics of the study reflecting the situation of the times. At growing study phase(first quadrant) study topics which are closely related to the study topic are arranged, and the topics, the center of the study, are positioned at the study topics of maturity phase(4th quadrant).

keywords
기업가정신, 동시단어분석, 전략 맵, 계량서지학, 지적구조, entrepreneurship, co-word Analysis, strategy map, bibliometrics, intellectual structure

Reference

1.

강임철. (2005). 동시출현 단어분석을 통한 도메인 기초 온톨로지 개발 에이전트.

2.

김영수. (2009). 사내기업가정신이 기업의 급진적 혁신에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구. 상업교육연구, 23(3), 489-519.

3.

김종관. (1994). 기업가정신의 개념과 연구접근 방법. 동남경영, 9, 27-52.

4.

남기성. (2010). SPSS18을 이용한 통계분석은 어떻게:자유아카데미.

5.

남영호. (1994). 기업가정신이란 무엇인가. 사회 과학연구, 4, 145-163.

6.

노재구. (1999). 기업가 및 기업가정신에 관한 이론적 고찰. 충북개발연구, 10(2), 183-214.

7.

박재린. (1996). 기업성장과 기업가정신의 관한 연구. 동림경영연구, 4, 23-45.

8.

배종태. (2005). 기업가정신과 벤처경영 부문의 연구동향: 한국과 미국의 학술지 비교분석 (1998-2004). 기업가정신과 벤처연구, 8(3), 141-177.

9.

유영준. (2003). 문헌정보학의 지식구조에 관한 연구.

10.

이방래. (2008). 계량정보분석시스템으로서의 KnowledgeMatrix 개발. 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 8(1), 68-74.

11.

이우형. (2006). Co-word Analysis을 통한 신기술 분야 도식화 방법에 관한 연구. 경영과학, 23(3), 77-94.

12.

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 333-355.

13.

한국과학정보기술원. (2008). KnowledgeMatrix 를 활용한 정보분석. .

14.

Callon, M. (1991). Co-word analysis as tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 153-203.

15.

Courtial, J-P. (1989). A co-word study of artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science, 19, 301-311.

16.

Ding, Y. (2001). Bibliography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37, 817-842.

17.

King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13, 261-276.

18.

Law, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3), 251-264.

19.

Law, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the coword method. Scientometrics, 23(3), 7-17.

20.

Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Why words and cowords cannot map the development of the science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 4(5), 418-427.

21.

McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.

22.

Nederhof, A. J. (1997). Mapping the social and behavioral sciences worldwide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts. Scientometrics, 40(2), 237-276.

23.

Noyons, E, C. M. (1998). Advance mapping of science and technology. Scientometrics, 41(1), 61-67.

24.

Qin, He. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. LIBRARY TRENDS, 48(1), 133-159.

25.

Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the America Society for Information Science, 50, 799-813.

26.

Tijssen, R. J .W. (1989). Mapping co-word structures: a comparison of multidimentional scaling and leximappe. Scientometrics, 15, 283-295.

27.

Van Rann, A. F. J. (1993). The neural net of neural network research. Scientometrics, 26(1), 169-192.

28.

Voutilainen, A. (1993). Nptool. A detector of english noun phrases. in: Proceedings of the workshop on very large corpora (-). Columbus, Ohio State University.

29.

Wortman, M. S. Jr. (1987). Entrepreneurship: An integrating typology and evaluation of the empirical research in the field. Journal of Management, 13(2), 259-279.

30.

Whittaker, J. (1989). Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and coword analysis. Social Studies of Science, 19, 473-496.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management