바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Comparative Analysis of Subject Headings Related to Korea in the National Library OPACs of Major Countries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.141-162
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.141

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyze the actual condition of data related to Korea shown in the catalog of 15 countries. This study was to compare the subject characteristics of Korea-related subject heading, record collection, and the characteristics of several subject heading, which has been a major issue. The results are as follows. To begin with, Korea-related record in most other national libraries runs absolutely short except for some countries like United States. Korea-related record is generally 2 to 3 times less than Japan related record. Second, referring to the subject distribution in sub criteria of Korea-related record, subject related to ‘history’ and ‘economy’ is shown in the highest rate. Considering that ‘Korean war’ shows the highest rate in Italy and Canada, we can consider that this may cause the distortion of the perception of Korea. Third, in the case of Korea-related record, the record of South Korea is 1.5 to 5 times more than that of North Kore, except for some countries like United States. Forth, regarding the subject headings, the terms such as ‘Taekwondo’, ‘Kimchi’, ‘Tok-do’, ‘Tong-hae’ have different meanings in different countries. However, these terms agree to LCSH in most countries except for neighboring countries. Fifth, in case of China and Japan, the subject headings in reference to political and historical position are raising some problems.

keywords
국가도서관, 주제명표목, 한국, 온라인 열람목록, 주제색인, national library, subject heading, KOREA, OPAC, subject index, national library, subject heading, KOREA, OPAC, subject index

Reference

1.

국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소. (2010). 주요 6개국 국립도서관 한국관련 주제어 자료집:국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소.

2.

김영귀. (1997). LC Subject Headings에 나타난 한국관련 주제명의 선정 및 표기에 관한연구. 부산여자대학교 논문집, 44, 237-272.

3.

김정현. (2010). 미국의회도서관 주제명표목표의 한·중·일 관련 주제명표목의 변천과정 비교 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(2), 147-169.

4.

김정현. (2009). LCSH 한국관련 주제명표목의 변천과정에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 40(3), 49-68.

5.

김태수. (1997). 주제명표목의 구조에 관한 연구. 情報管理學會誌, 14(1), 77-106.

6.

남태우. (2008). 자료조직 측면에서 독도표기 문제에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 291-310.

7.

문지현. (2011). 『国立国会図書館件名標目表』의 한·중 관련 주제명표목에 대한 비교 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(1), 247-267.

8.

윤정옥. (2001). 미국의회도서관 주제명표목표(LCSH)의 한국과 일본 관련 주제표목의 비교 연구. 도서관, 56(1), 30-55.

9.

윤희윤. (2006). 주요 선진국의 국가도서관시스템 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 5-31.

10.

정연경. (2010). 정보의 접근점으로서 미국의회도서관 주제명 표목에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(2), 51-72.

11.

이창수. (2010). 정보자료의 분류와 주제명:한국도서관협회.

12.

基本件名標目表. (1999). 基本件名標目表:日本圖書館協會.

13.

日本國立國会図書館. http://www.ndl.go.jp.

14.

中國國家圖書館. http://www.nlc.gov.cn/.

15.

Kim, Joy. Library of Congress Subject Headings: Related to Korea and East Asia in genera. [Unknown]: Association for Asian Studies.

16.

中國分类主题詞表. (2005). 中國分类主题詞表:北京圖書館出版社.

17.

Chan, Lois Mai. (2005). Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles and Application:LibrariesUnlimited.

18.

Library of Congress. (2009). Library of Congress Subject Headings:Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service.

19.

Biblioteca Nacional de Espana. http://www.bne.es/.

20.

Biblioteca Nacional de Mexico. http://bnm.unam.mx/.

21.

Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. http://www.bncf.firenze.sbn.it/.

22.

Biblioteka Narodowa. http://www.bn.org.pl/.

23.

Bibliotheque nationale de France. http://www.bnf.fr/.

24.

The British Library. http://www.bl.uk/.

25.

Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. http://www.d-nb.de/.

26.

Koninklijke Bibliotheek. http://www.kb.nl/.

27.

Library and Archives Canada. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/.

28.

Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/.

29.

Milli Kütüphane. http://www.mkutup.gov.tr/.

30.

National Library of Australia. http://www.nla.gov.au/.

31.

Российская государственная библиотека. http://www.rsl.ru/.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management