바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.3
Citation Share

A Study on Faceted Navigation in Next-Generation Library Catalog

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.13-30
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.013

(2011). A Study on Faceted Navigation in Next-Generation Library Catalog. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 13-30, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.013
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Faceted navigation has brought a lot of changes to traditional library catalog and is one of the resource discovery interfaces in next-gen library catalog. Faceted navigation usually divides too much retrieved results into some relevant facets for user's convenient navigation. The faceted navigation of 9 libraries adopting resource discovery interfaces was analyzed in this article. The terms are much broader or different from the users' terms so that the users can't properly use the facets. It is essential to maintain consistency with using the terms to provide users with faceted navigation service and this study has found how exactly authority work was done in analysis of the author facets. Also, public libraries introducing faceted navigation need to consider including some facets for various users and university libraries need to consider detailed division of resource types.

keywords
차세대 목록, 자원 발견 인터페이스, 이용자 인터페이스, 패싯 내비게이션, 패싯 분석, next-generation library catalog, resource discovery interfaces, user interface, faceted navigation, facet analysis

Reference

1.

심경. (2008). 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례: AquaBrowser. 도서관문화, 49(10), 48-56.

2.

심경. (2008). 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 (2): WorldCat Local. 도서관문화, 49(11), 54-61.

3.

윤정옥. (2010). 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(1), 5-28.

4.

Antelman, Kristin. (2006). Toward a Twenty-First Century Library Catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 128-139.

5.

AquaBrowser. The University of Chicago Library. http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/.

6.

BiblioCommons. CLEVNET. http://www.clevnet.org/.

7.

Bowen. (2008). Metadata to support next-generation library resource discovery: lessons form the eXtensible catalog, phase 1. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(2), 6-19.

8.

Breeding, Marshall. (2010). Next-Gen Library Catalogs:Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.

9.

Emanuel, Jennifer. (2011). Usability of the VuFind Next-generation online catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 30(1), 44-52.

10.

Encore. Wayne State University Libraries. http://encore.lib.wayne.edu.

11.

Endeca. University of North Carolina Libraries. http://www.lib.unc.edu/.

12.

Featherstone, Robin. (2009). Enhancing Subject Access to Electronic Collections with VuFind. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 6(4), 294-306.

13.

Hearst, Marti. (2006). Design Recommendations for Hierarchical Faceted Search (26-30). SIGIR 2006. Workshop on Faceted Search.

14.

Interfaces. . http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/papers /faceted-workshop06.pdf.

15.

LS2 PAC. Shenandoah County Library. http://shenandoah.co.lib.va.us/.

16.

McGuinness, Deborah L. (2003). Ontologies come of age, In Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential:MIT Press.

17.

Primo. 연i세대학교학술정보관. http://library.yonsei.ac.kr/main/mai n.do.

18.

Summon. West Virginia University Libraries. http://www.libraries.wvu.edu.

19.

VuFind. National Library of Australia. http://www.nla.gov.au/.

20.

University of Washington Libraries. http://www.lib.washington.edu/.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy