바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

RDA 자원유형의 KCR4 적용에 관한 연구

A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.3, pp.103-121
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103
이미화 (이화여자대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 RDA 자원유형을 KCR4에 적용하기 위한 방안을 모색하기 위한 것이다. KCR4의 GMD는 내용과 용기의 용어가 혼합되어 적합한 용어를 선정하기 어렵고, FRBR 개념모형 구현도 용이하지 않다. SMD도 이용자의 요구에 맞는 최신의 용어가 포함되지 않아 변경이 필요한 실정이다. 기 개발된 RDA 자원유형은 AACR2 GMD의 한계를 극복하기 위해 다양한 용어의 측면을 고려하였고, 앞으로 목록분야에 많은 영향을 줄 수 있다. 따라서 국내 목록환경에 RDA 자원유형의 적용가능성이 모색되어야 할 것이다. 이를 위해 사례조사, 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 사례조사는 국내 대학도서관 한 개 기관을 대상으로 GMD 기술의 전수조사를 실시하여 용어의 변경 및 사서 및 이용자가 원하는 용어의 방향을 파악하였다. 설문조사에서는 국내 대학도서관 사서를 대상으로 자원유형 기술의 현황과 문제점 및 RDA 자원유형 이해정도를 파악하였다. 조사결과 자원유형 용어는 검색과 기술을 위해 구체적이고 이용자가 이해하기 쉬운 용어로 변경이 필요하였다. RDA 적용 테스트에서는 자원유형에 따라 정답률에 차이가 있었다. 조사를 바탕으로 RDA 내용유형에 컴퓨터게임을, 용기유형에 DVD, CD-ROM, Blu-Ray, 컴퓨터파일을 추가하여 KCR4의 자원유형을 제안하였다. 기술방식과 화면출력에서도 RDA의 방식을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 RDA 자원유형의 국내 적용가능성을 모색하여, KCR4 자원유형 개정의 기반을 마련하였다.

Abstract

This study is to seek to apply resource types of RDA to KCR4. It is difficult to choose appropriate term and to embody FRBR model because GMD of KCR4 is the mixture of content-based vocabularies and carrier-based vocabularies. SMD is to need to reflect the current technological terms. Resource type of RDA was already developed to overcome limitation of AACR2's GMD, and would affect the world cataloging environment, therefore it is need to apply resource type of RDA to Korean cataloging rule. For this study, case study and survey were used. In case study, it was to scan all GMD term for one university library to build by programming and to grape librarian and users’ potential need. In the survey by cataloging librarian, it was to figure out the current description of resource type in university library and to test RDA resource type. As a result, it was needed to revise the vocabulary to the obvious and user-understandable list. Also it was different in correction rate in RDA testing by resource type. Based on the case study and the survey, RDA resource type was applied to KCR4 resource list by adding term such as computer game in content type, and by inserting terms such as DVD, CD-ROM, Blu-Ray, computer file in carrier type. It also applied RDA description method and display means to KCR4. This study would apply RDA resource type to KCR4 and contribute to revise KCR4 resource type.

참고문헌

1

이미화. (2011). KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새로운 방안 모색. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(2), 237-255.

2

한국도서관협회. (2003). 한국목록규칙:한국도서관협회.

3

Chapman, A. (2006). RDA: A new international standard. Ariadne, 49(OCT. 2006). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue49/chapman.

4

Chung, H. H. (2001). User-friendly audiovisual material cataloging at Westchester County Public Library System. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 31(3), 313-325.

5

Delsey, T. (1998). The Logical Structure of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/aacr.pdf.

6

Delsey, T. (2006). Categorization of Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5rda-parta-categorization.pdf.

7

Dunsire, G. (2007). Distinguishing content from carrier: the RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1), -.

8

GMD/SMD Working Group. (2005). Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/17891.

9

Green, R. (2007). Anticipating new media: A faceted classification of material types. In Proceedings North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization(Toronto: Ontario, 2007): 87-99. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/arizona/bitstream/10150/106475/1/63_Green.pdf.

10

Guerrini, M. (2004). GMD: Its function and its history. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(2), 61-74.

11

Hider, P. (2009). A Comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560.

12

Hider, P. (2009). Library resource categories and their possible groupings. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2), 105-115.

13

JSC for Development of RDA. (2011). RDA: Resource Description and Access:ALA.

14

JSC Format Variation Working Group. (2003). Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR(JSC) Format Variation Working Group. http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2003/2003-report01.html.

15

Kiorgaard, D. (2006). RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization. www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2007/5chair10.pdf.

16

Seikel, M. (2011). How MARC has changed: the history of the format and its forthcoming relationship to RDA. Technical Services Quarterly, 28, 322-334.

17

Tillett, B. (2001). General Material Designations (GMDs). http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/gmd.pdf.

18

Weihs, J. (2000). General Material Designations in the Twenty-first century. http://www.olacinc.org/drupal/capc_files/gmd.pdf.

19

Weihs, J. (2008). Designating materials: from "germane terms" to element types. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(4), 3-24.

20

Yee, M. M. (2007). FRBR and moving image materials: content versus carrier. In Understanding FRBR(CT: Libraries Unlimited,2007): 117-130. http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/2648.

21

RDA Test Coordinating Committee. (2011). Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf.

정보관리학회지