바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

디지털도서관 분야의 학제적 공동연구 분석에 관한 연구

Interdisciplinary Collaborations in the Domain of Digital Libraries

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.2, pp.37-51
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.037
정은경 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The domain of digital libraries is one of interdisciplinary fields since it contains various aspects of digital libraries. The main findings of digital library interdisciplinarity have been discussed in terms of contents, management and infrastructural technologies within the field of library and information science. The purpose of this study is to identify and widen the interdisciplinary structure of digital library domain by analyzing the collaborations from different disciplines. With 1,394 research articles of digital libraries from 1997 to 2010, the analysis of collaborations of authors from various disciplines was conducted. The results identified that three subject areas of authors such as Information science and library science, Computer science and Engineering were found as the centers to collaborate with various disciplines. In addition, sub-domains of digital library were recognized in terms of core digital library area, natural science area, medical related area and biology and medical area. The findings of this study depict the domain of digital libraries as a variety of subject areas since digital library domain is characterized with both research and practices.

keywords
디지털도서관, 공저자분석, 학제성, 도메인 분석, digital libraries, co-author analysis, interdisciplinarity, domain analysis, digital libraries, co-author analysis, interdisciplinarity, domain analysis

참고문헌

1.

Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management, 35, 227-243.

2.

Chen, C. R. (2007). Author affiliation index, finance journal ranking and the pattern of authorship. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 1008-1026.

3.

Chung, E. (2010). Digital Libraries. In Introductory Concepts in Information Science:American Society for Information Science and Technology.

4.

Cronin, B. (2008). Applying the author affiliation index to Library and Information Science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1810-1818.

5.

이재윤. (2007). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 MDS 지도 작성 방식의 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 335-357.

6.

Lee, J. Y. (2010). Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 36, 144-161.

7.

Liu, X.. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1462-1480.

8.

Liew, C. L. (2009). Digital library research 1997-2007: organizational and people issues. Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 245-266.

9.

Lui, Z. (2005). Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography: a journal network analysis. Journal of Information Science, 31, 308-316.

10.

Morillo, F. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.

11.

Morillo, F. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in Science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.

12.

Porter, A. L. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117-147.

13.

Porter, A. L. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?: measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745.

14.

Qin, J. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinarity research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893-916.

15.

Rinia, E. J. (2002). Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics, 53(2), 241-248.

16.

Schunn, C. D. (1998). The growth of multidisciplinarity in the cognitive science society. Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 319-332.

17.

Schwartz, C. (2000). Digital libraries: an overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(6), 385-393.

18.

Tijssen, R. J.W. (1992). A qualitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: co-classification analysis. Research Policy, 21, 27-44.

정보관리학회지