바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

계량정보학의 지적구조 분석 연구: 2001-2010년 연구영역 분석

Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.2, pp.11-36
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.011
이재윤 (경기대학교)
최상희 (대구가톨릭대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Since the 1990s, informetrics has grown in popularity among information scientists. Today it is a general discipline that comprises all kinds of metrics, including bibliometrics and scientometrics. To illustrate the dynamic progress of this field, this study aims to identify the structure and infrastructure of the informetrics literature using statistical and profiling methods. Informetrics literature was obtained from the Web of Knowledge for the years 2001-2010. The selected articles contain least one of these keywords: ‘informetrics’, ‘bibliometrics’, ‘scientometrics’, ‘webometrics’, and ‘citation analysis.’ Noteworthy publication patterns of major countries were identified by a statistical method. Intellectual structure analysis shows major research areas, authors, and journals.

참고문헌

1

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). nformetrics at the beginning of the 21st century: A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52.

2

Brookes, B. C. (1990). iblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics? What are we talking about (31-43). Informetrics 89/90. Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics, Amsterdam. Elsevier.

3

Garfield, E. E. (1955). itation indexed for sciencenew dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.

4

Glänzel, W. (2001). wo decades of SCIENTOMETRICS. Scientometrics, 50(2), 301-312.

5

Godin, B. (2005). easurement and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present (-). Proceedings of the 11th DIS Annual Conference 2010, 2nd-3rd September, Richardsbay, University of Zululand, South Africa.

6

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). n index to quantify an individual’ scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.

7

Hood, W. W. (2001). he literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. P Scientometrics, 52(2), 291-314.

8

김희전. (2010). 저자동시인용분석과 저자서지결합분석에 의한 지적 구조 분석: 사회복지학 분야를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 283-306.

9

Lee, Jae Yun. (2006). owards a new method for examining current domestic intellectual structure of knowledge domains (145-152). Proceeding of the 13th Annual Conference of Korean Society for Information Management.

10

이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.

11

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

12

이재윤. (2008). 서지적 저자결합분석 - 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근. 정보관리학회지, 25(1), 173-190.

13

이재윤. (2007). 국내 광역 과학 지도 생성 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 363-383.

14

이재윤. (2010). 저자 프로파일링과 요인분석을 이용한 국내 주거학 분야의 지적 구조 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(2), 285-308.

15

이재윤. (2010). Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 36(2), 144-161.

16

이재윤. (2011). 계량서지적 기법을 활용한 LED 핵심 주제영역의 연구 동향 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 1-26.

17

Morris, Steven A. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 213-295.

18

유종덕. (2011). 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 123-144.

19

Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization:Ablex.

20

Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. (1992). An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing & Management, 28(1), 1-3.

21

White, Howard D. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.

22

Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation culture.

정보관리학회지