바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rules from AACR2 to RDA

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.1, pp.23-42
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.023

(2011). A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rules from AACR2 to RDA. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 23-42, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.023
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study is to compare the descriptive cataloging rules between AACR2 and RDA, and then to find a direction of future cataloging and KCR 4. RDA is new cataloging rules that embody the International Cataloging Principles(2009), FRBR and FRAD. It is a structure of bibliographic control of all kinds of resources, and the rules can be flexibly applicable in the international cataloging community. It is critical to embody RDA in KCR 4 because RDA is likely to affect the future cataloging through its collocation function and relation function to construct semantic web of OPAC. This study analyzed the descriptive rules of work, expression, and manifestation based on RDA draft(2008) of JSC for Development of RDA. It analyzed the changes in the cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA in such descriptive areas as title, type of resources, statement of responsibility, edition, publication, physical description and series in the manifestation level, and the preferred access points in both expression and work levels. The findings of this study will provide implications in revising KCR4.

keywords
RDA, resource description and access, KCR4, AACR2, MARC21, FRBR, FRAD, 자원기술과 접근, 한국목록규칙, 영미목록규칙, RDA, resource description and access, KCR4, AACR2, MARC21, FRBR, FRAD

Reference

1.

박진희. (2009). RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 40(2), 111-138.

2.

이미화. (2010). MARC 데이터의 RDA 저작 및 표현형 요소 분석을 통한 한국목록규칙 및 KORMARC의 고려사항. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(2), 251-272.

3.

조재인. (2005). 표현형 계층을 중심으로 한 FRBR 모형 분석 및 목록 체계 수용에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(2), 221-239.

4.

한국도서관협회. (2003). 한국목록규칙:한국도서관협회.

5.

American Library Association. (2002). Anglo- American Cataloging Rules:American Library Association.

6.

Bianchini, C. (2009). From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(2), 105-124.

7.

Delsey, T. (2009a). AACR2 versus RDA in From Rules to Entities: Cataloging with RDA. http://tsig.wikispaces.com/file/view /AACR2_versus_RDA.pdf.

8.

Hider, P. (2009). comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560.

9.

Hitchens, A. (2009). Preparing catalogers for RDA training. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(8), 691-707.

10.

Howarth, L. C. (2008). Enigma variations: Parsing the riddle of main entry and the rules of three from AACR2 to RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2), 201-220.

11.

IFLA. (2009). Functional Requirements for Authory Data:Saur.

12.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (2008). RDA: Resource Description and Access. http://www.rda-jsc.org/rdafulldraft. html.

13.

Jones, E. (2007). The shape of things to come: Resource Description and Access(RDA). Serials Librarian, 52(3), 281-289.

14.

Library of Congress. (2010). RDA TEST: Train the Trainer. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-fu ture/rda/trainthetrainer.html.

15.

Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (2010). RDA in MARC. http://www.loc.gov/marc/RDAinM ARC29.html.

16.

Oliver, C. (2010). Introducing RDA: a Guide to the Basics:American Library Association.

17.

Schiff, A. L. (2010). Changes from AACR2 to RDA: a Comparison of Examples. http://faculty.washington.edu/aschi ff/BCLAPresentationWithNotes-Rev May2010.pdf.

18.

Taylor, A. G. (2006). Introduction to Cataloging and Classification:Libraries Unlimited.

19.

Tillet, B. (2009). Changes from AACR2 for texts. Presented at ABA Supervisors' Forum. www.rda-jsc.org/docs/10_1_12_RD AchangesfromAACR2fortexts.ppt.

20.

Weihs, J. (2008). Uniform titles from AACR to RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4), 362-384.

21.

Delsey, T. (2009b). FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA. presentations.ala.org/images/b/b2/F RBR_and_FRAD_as_implemented_i n_RDA.ppt.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy