A Study on the Operational Policies and Best Practice of Repository

정영미; 이상기

doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.131

Apply for Authority
P-ISSN1013-0799
E-ISSN2586-2073
KCI

Home

OA Policy

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.27 No.4

Citation Share

A Study on the Operational Policies and Best Practice of Repository

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073

2010, v.27 no.4, pp.131-152

https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.131

& (2010). A Study on the Operational Policies and Best Practice of Repository. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 131-152, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.131

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated and analyzed operating policies and status of the best practices repository in the world to propose the successful strategies of management and establishment of repository. The best practices were selected from the top 10 of the Ranking Web of World Repositories by CSIC and Registry of Open Access Repositories by JISC. These repositories fell into two rough classes, disciplinary and institutional repositories. Policies on operation and support, collection, management, distribution and information services, long-term preservation, technology and copyright were analyzed. Characteristic of disciplinary and institutional repository policies were also identified.

keywords: repository, open access, operational policy, disciplinary repository, institutional repository, 리포지터리, 오픈 액세스, 운영정책, 주제 리포지터리, 기관 리포지터리

Reference

황혜경. (2004). 오픈액세스기반 지식정보저장소 구축에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 15(1), 91-116.

황혜경. (2009). 오픈액세스기반 기관리포지터리 성공에 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 26(4), 35-57.

Crow, Raym. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. .

Johnson, Richard K.. (2002). Institutional Repositories: Partnering with Faculty to Enhance Scholarly Communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11), -.

Lercher, Aaron. (2008). A Survey of Attitudes About Digital Repositories Among Faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 408-415.

Lynch, C. A.. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. http://www.arl.org/newsltr//226/ir.html.

Proudman, Vanessa. (2007). CERN Document Server: Institutional Repository and Service. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=68180.

Robinson, Michael. (2009). Promoting the Visibility of Educational Research through an Institutional Repository. Serials Review, 35(3), 133-137.

Rumsey, Sally. (2006). The Purpose of Institutional Repositories in UK Higher Education: A Repository Manager's View. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 181-186.

10.

Shearer, Kathleen. (2002). Institutional Repositories: Towards the Identification of Critical Success Factors. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27(3), 250-263.

11.

Westell, Mary. (2006). Institutional Reposito ries: Proposed Indicators of Success. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 211-226.

12.

Xia, Jingfeng. (2007). Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories: Across Disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647-654.

13.

Xia, Jingfeng. (2007). Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositoies: Depositorship and Full-Text Availability. Serials Review, 33, 14-21.

14.

Xia, Jingfeng. (2007). Factors to Assess Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories. Serials Review, 33, 73-80.

15.

arXiv.org e-Print Archive. http://arxiv.org.

16.

CERN Document Server. http://cdsweb.cern.ch.

17.

CiteSeerX. http://citesserx.ist.psu.edu/.

18.

Defense Technical Information Center. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/.

19.

DSpace@MIT. http://dspace.mit.edu/.