바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Informetric Study on Academic Activities and Environmental Movements in Solving Global Environmental Problems

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.3, pp.83-102
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.083


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study aims to understand and compare the characteristics of two major approaches to solving global environmental problems-an academic approach including scholarly activities of environmental sciences and a practical approach of environmental movements led by NGOs-by employing informetric analysis methods. Knowledge structure of environmental sciences is depicted through co-citation networks of subject categories assigned to the cited journals in the discipline of environmental sciences for the 10-year period from 2000 to 2009. Furthermore, major interests of environmental NGOs are identified on the basis of external link data collected from web sites of the NGOs. Co-word analyses are also performed using the texts of journal papers in environmental sciences as well as news articles provided by NGO sites. Through the analyses, dominant subject areas of environmental sciences and environmental movements are identified demonstrating similarities and differences between the two approaches.

keywords
지구적 환경문제, 환경 NGOs, 지식 구조, 웹 링크 분석, 동시인용 분석, 동시출현단어 분석, global environmental problems, environmental NGOs, knowledge structure, web link analysis, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, global environmental problems, environmental NGOs, knowledge structure, web link analysis, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis

Reference

1.

고운미. (2006). 환경 NGO 활동에 참여하는 지역사회 주민의 만족도에 미치는 영향 분석 - 환경운동연합을 중심으로. 한국학술정보.

2.

김판준. (2007). 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 285-303.

3.

레이븐, 버그. (2001). 환경학:보문사.

4.

박연. (2002). 환경 NGO의 국제 연대에 관한 연구: 동북아 사례를 중심으로.

5.

정영미. (2007). 국가 정보유통 활성화를 위한 학술적 웹 공간 특성 및 구조 분석. 한국과학기술정보연구원.

6.

오경택. (2000). 21세기 국제관계 연구의 쟁점과 과제:박영사.

7.

이두곤. (2003). 환경과학적 측면에서의 해양환경공학의 학문적 성격과 발전 방향 (131-137). 한국해양환경공학회 2003년도 추계학술대회논문집.

8.

임윤정. (2005). 환경문제 해결을 위한 환경 NGO의 초국적 협력.

9.

정호연. (2007). 저널 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구.

10.

Björneborn, L.. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227.

11.

de Nooy, W.. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek:Cambridge University Press.

12.

Engels, A.. (2005). Recent internationalization of global environmental change research in Germany and the U.S.. Scientometrics, 62(1), 67-85.

13.

Europa. (2004). The Europa Directory of International Organizations:Europa.

14.

Gale Group. (2005). Encyclopedia of Associations: a Guide to More than 22,000 National and International Organizations:Gale Group.

15.

Hass, Peter M.. (2004). Addressing the global governance deficit. Global Environmental Politics, 4(4), 1-15.

16.

Jappe, Arlette.. (2007). Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics, 71(3), 367-390.

17.

Neff, Mark W.. (2009). 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics, 80(3), 657-682.

18.

Porter, G.. (1991). Global Environmental Politics:Westview Press.

19.

Tsay, M.. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of hydrogen energy literature, 1965-2005. Scientometrics, 75(3), 421-438.

20.

Zhang, G.. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics, 83(2), 477-492.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management