바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

토픽맵 기반 의학 정보 검색 시스템 구축을 통한 온톨로지 구축 및 방법론 연구

Ontology Implementation and Methodology Revisited Using Topic Maps based Medical Information Retrieval System

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.3, pp.35-51
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.035
이명호 (상명대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Emerging Web 2.0 services such as Twitter, Blogs, and Wikis alongside the poorly- structured and immeasurable growth of information requires an enhanced information organization approach. Ontology has received much attention over the last 10 years as an emerging approach for enhancing information organization. However, there is little penetration into current systems. The purpose of this study is to propose ontology implementation and methodology. To achieve the goal of this study, limitations of traditional information organization approaches are addressed and emerging information organization approaches are presented. Two ontology data models, RDF/OW and Topic Maps, are compared and then ontology development processes and methodology with topic maps based medical information retrieval system are addressed. The comparison of two data models allows users to choose the right model for ontology development.

참고문헌

1

Aitchison, J.. (2000). Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual (4th ed.):Fitzroy Dearborn.

2

ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005. Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press.

3

Bean, C. A.. (1998). The Semantics of Hierarchy: Explicit Parent-Child Relationships in MeSH Tree Structures (-). Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO Conference.

4

Berners-Lee, T.. (1998). What the Semantic Web can represent. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html.

5

Bush, V.. (1945). As We May Think:The Atlantic Monthly.

6

Cardoso, J.. (2008). Developing Course Management Systems Using the Semantic Web Semantic Web and Beyond Computing for Human Experience(6):Springer.

7

Demo, B.. (2007). E-learning: Coupling Course Management Systems and Dynamic Taxonomies (-). Paper presented at the FIND’07 Workshop on Dynamic Taxonomies and Faceted Search.

8

Efthimiadis, E. N.. (1996). Query Expansion. in: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). vol. 31:Learned Information, Inc.

9

Fonseca, F.. (2007). The double role of ontologies in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 786-793.

10

Freeman, R. T.. (2006). Topological tree clustering of web search results (789-797). Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - Ideal 2006, Proceedings.

11

Furnas, G. W.. (1987). The Vocabulary Problem in Human-System Communication. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 964-971.

12

Garshol, L. M.. (2002). What Are Topic Maps. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/11/topicmaps.html.

13

Garshol, L. M.. (2004). Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! Making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science, 30(4), 378-391.

14

Greenberg, J.. (2001). Optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesauri terminology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(6), 487-498.

15

Gruber, T.. (1993). What is an Ontology?. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html.

16

Guarino, N.. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. in: Formal ontology and information systems:IOS Press.

17

Gulbrandsen, A.. (2006). Conceptual Modeling of Topic Maps with ORM Versus UML. in: Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape. vol. 3873:Springer.

18

Guo, Y.. (2004). An Evaluation of Knowledge Base Systems for Large OWL Datasets (-). Paper presented at the Third Interna tional Semantic Web Conference.

19

Hearst, M. A.. (2006). Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 59-61.

21

Ian Horrocks. (2005). Semantic Web Architecture: Stack or Two Towers?. in: Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning:Springer.

22

Jansen, B. J.. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 207-227.

23

Jonassen, D. H.. (1993). Hand-Book of Individual Differences: Learning and Instruction:Lawrence Erlbaum.

24

Jun, W.. (2006). Automatic thesaurus development: Term extraction from title metadata. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(7), 907-920.

25

Khan, M.. (2004). Enhanced Web document retrieval using automatic query expansion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 29-40.

26

Kim, H.. (2005). ONTOWEB: Implementing an ontology-based Web retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1167-1176.

27

Kim, H.. (2004). Implementing an Ontology-Based Knowledge Management System in the Korean Financial Firm Environment (-). Paper presented at the ASIST AM 04.

28

Kim, J. M.. (2007). Schema and constraints-based matching and merging of Topic Maps. Information Processing & Management, 43(4), 930-945.

29

Krishnamurthy, M.. (2006). Library portals: Ontological representation of knowledge on the web. Information Studies, 12(2), 75-84.

30

La Barre, K.. (2007). Faceted navigation and browsing features in new OPACs: Robust support for scholarly information seeking?. Knowledge Organization, 34, 78-90.

31

Leroy, G.. (2005). Genescene: An ontology-enhanced integration of linguistic and co-occurrence based relations in biomedical texts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(5), 457-468.

32

Leuenberger, M.. (2006). Topic Maps for Image Collections. in: Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape. vol. 3873:Springer.

33

Miller, G. A.. (1995). WORDNET - A LEXICAL DATABASE FOR ENGLISH. Communica tions of the ACM, 38(11), 39-41.

34

Molholt, P.. (1996). Standardization of Inter-concept Links and their Usage (-). Paper presented at the 4th International ISKO Conference.

35

Müller, H.-M.. (2004). Textpresso: An ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature. PLoS Biology, 2(11), 1984-1998.

36

Naing, M.-M.. (2006). Extracting link chains of relationship instances from a Web site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1590-1605.

37

Novak, J. D.. (1984). Learning How to Learn:Cambridge University Press.

38

Ohlms, C.. (2002). The Business Potential of Ontologybased Knowledge Management:McKinsey & Company.

39

Otwell, A.. (2002). Comparison of Content Organization Methods. http://www.heyotwell.com/work/ia/contentorgmethods.doc.

40

Pepper, S.. (2002). The TAO of Topic Maps. http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tao.html.

41

Perreault, J.. (1965). Categories and relators: a new schema. Revue Internationale De La Documentation, 32(4), 136-144.

42

Peterson, D.. (2009). Obama’s Groundbreaking use of the Semantic Web. http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/03/19/obama-groundbreaking-use-semantic-web/.

43

Qin, J.. (2006). Building interoperable vocabulary and structures for learning objects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 280-292.

44

Ramalho, J.. (2006). Metamorphosis - A Topic Maps Based Environment to Handle Heterogeneous Information Resources. in: Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape. vol. 3873:Springer.

45

Ras, Z. W.. (2004). Ontology-based distributed autonomous knowledge systems. Information Systems, 29(1), 47-58.

46

Rice, D. C.. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103-1127.

47

Rolletschek, G.. (2007). How Search can Profit from Dynamic Taxonomies (-). Paper presented at the FIND’07 Workshop on Dynamic Taxonomies and Faceted Search.

48

Ross, K. A.. (2005). Querying faceted databases. Semantic Web and Databases, 3372, 199-218.

49

Roth, W. M.. (1993). The Concept Map as a Tool for the Collaborative Construction of Knowledge - a Microanalysis of High-school Physics Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 503-534.

50

Sacco, G. M.. (2007). Research Results in Dynamic Taxonomy and Faceted Search Systems (-). Paper presented at the FIND’07 Workshop on Dynamic Taxonomies and Faceted Search.

51

Schmitz-Esser, W.. (1999). Thesaurus and beyond. An advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval. Knowledge Organization, 26(1), 10-29.

52

Shiri, A.. (2006). Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment: A user-centered evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(4), 462-478.

53

Smith, G.. (2006). FacetMap: A scalable search and browse visualization. Ieee Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5), 797-804.

54

Tseng, Y.. (2002). Automatic thesaurus generation for Chinese documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1130-1138.

55

Tzitzikas, Y.. (2006). Revising faceted taxonomies and CTCA expressions (600-604). Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings.

56

Tzitzikas, Y.. (2007). Evolution of faceted taxonomies and CTCA expressions. Knowledge and Information Systems, 13, 337-365.

57

Williams, C. G.. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414-421.

58

Yi, M.. (2006). Ontology as a Technology of Convertgence: Developing a Classification of the ITWF Using Topic Maps (-). Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR).

59

Zeng, M. L.. (2005). Using software to teach thesaurus development and indexing in graduate programs of LIS and IAKM. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, , 11-13.

정보관리학회지