바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.27 No.2
Citation Share

메타데이터 상호운용성 확보를 위한 패싯 프레임워크 구축

Faceted Framework for Metadata Interoperability

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.2, pp.75-94
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.075
이승민 (Indiana University)
이승민. (2010). 메타데이터 상호운용성 확보를 위한 패싯 프레임워크 구축. 정보관리학회지, 27(2), 75-94, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.075
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

In the current information environment, metadata interoperability has become the predominant way of organizing and managing resources. However, current approaches to metadata interoperability focus on the superficial mapping between labels of metadata elements without considering semantics of each element. This research applied facet analysis to address these difficulties in achieving metadata interoperability. By categorizing metadata elements according to these semantic and functional similarities, this research identified different types of facets: basic, conceptual, and relational. Through these different facets, a faceted framework was constructed to mediate semantic, syntactical, and structural differences across heterogeneous metadata standards.

keywords
metadata, metadata interoperability, facet analysis, basic facet, conceptual facet, relational facet, faceted framework, 메타데이터, 메타데이터 상호운용, 패싯분석, 기본패싯, 개념패싯, 관계패싯, 패싯 프레임워크

참고문헌

1.

Arms, W. Y.. (2002). spectrum of interoperability: The site for science prototype for the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1), -.

2.

Blanchi, C.. (2001). Distributed interoperable metadata registry. D-Lib Magazine, 7(12), -.

3.

Chan, L. M.. (2005). Metadata interoperability: A methodological study (110-115). Proceedings of the 3rd China-U.S. Library Conference.

4.

Gill, T. P.. (2002). Re-inventing the wheel?: Standards, interoperability and digital cultural content. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1), -.

5.

Jung, H.. (2006). Project report on a Korean Science & Technology Thesaurus with conceptual/relational facets (311-313). Proceedings of 3rd International WordNet Conference.

6.

Kumar, P.S.G.. Introduction to Colon Classification, Dattsons, Nagpur, 1987.

7.

Miller, P.. (2000). Interoperability: What is it and why should I want it?. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability.

8.

Moen, W. E.. (2003). Assessing metadata utilization: An analysis of MARC content designation use (171-180). Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DC-2003.

9.

Oltmans, E. E.. (2001). Metadata Interoperability. https://doc.telin.nl/dsweb/Get/Document-14690/interoperability.pdf.

10.

Priss, U.. (1998). A graphical interface for faceted thesaurus design (107-118). Proceedings of the 9th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. American Society for Information Science, Silver Spring.

11.

Ranganathan, S. R.. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification:Asia Publishing House.

12.

Svenonius, E.. (2000). Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization:MIT Press.

13.

Taylor, A.G.. (1992). The Organization of Information. http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/path.html.

14.

Yang, K.. (2004). Organizing the Web: Semi-Automatic construction of a faceted scheme (374-381). Proceedings of IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2004, ICWI 2004.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책