바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

지식 공유에 대한 소셜 네트워크 접근법 : 어떻게 소셜 네트워크의 구조와 특징이 지식 공유를 지원하는가?

Social Network Approach for Sharing Knowledge: How Can the Structure and Characteristics of Social Networks Support for Sharing Knowledge?

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.2, pp.61-74
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.061
이정수 (대림대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The knowledge sharing in a knowledge management process is much affecting generation and distribution of knowledge. Especially, the knowledge distribution is being revitalized with the center of social media service like twitter and library service 2.0 in the knowledge-based IT (Information Technology) environment. The present research analyzed the structure and characteristics of a social network inside an organization that is growing like an organism through self-organization through tools for SNA (Social Network Analysis) and multiple regression analysis of independent variables such as 1) a relationship between social network's structure and knowledge sharing, 2) a relationship between structural holes and knowledge sharing influence of centrality, 3) a relationship between individual ability and knowledge sharing of information technology and work recognition.

참고문헌

1

Allee, V.. (1997). The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence:Butterworth-Heinemann.

2

Burt, R. S.. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. in: Guillén The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field:Russell Sage Foundation.

3

Ciborra, C.. (1998). Groupware and teamwork in RandD: Limits to learning and innovation. RandD Management, 28(1), -.

4

Coleman, D.. (1999). Groupware: Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge Management Handbook:CRC Press.

5

Davenport, T. H.. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know:Harvard Business School Pr..

6

Drucker, P. F.. (1993). Managing for the Future:Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford.

7

Freeman, Linton C.. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-40.

8

Granovetter, M. S.. (1973). The strength of weak ties. AJS, 78(6), -.

9

Khamseh, H. M.. (2008). Knowledge transfer in alliances: Determinant factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 37-.

10

Krackhardt, D.. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. in: Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action:Harvard Business School Press.

11

Kim, Gu.. (2003). Exploratory study on motivation of knowledge sharing utilizing information & Communication technology. Journal of Korean Association Regional Information, 6(1), 69-.

12

O’Dell, C.. (1998). If only we knew what we know. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.

13

Podolny, J. M.. (1997). Relationships and resources: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673-693.

14

Ronald, B.. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition:Harvard.

15

Roos, G.. (1997). Measuring your company's intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413-426.

16

RUGGLES, R.. (1998). The state of notion: Knowledge in practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.

17

Scott, D. W.. (1992). Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization:Wiley-Interscience.

18

Simonin, B. L.. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623.

19

Skyrme, D. J.. (2002). Developing a knowledge strategy: From management to leadership knowledge. in: Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works:MIT Press.

20

Wiig, K. M.. (2000). Application of Knowledge Management in Public Administration. http://www.krii.com/downloads/km_in_public_admin_rev.pdf.

정보관리학회지