바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

이미지 검색 과정에 나타난 질의 전환 및 재구성 패턴에 관한 연구

Examining Categorical Transition and Query Reformulation Patterns in Image Search Process

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.2, pp.37-60
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.037
정은경 (이화여자대학교)
윤정원 (University of South Florida)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate image search query reformulation patterns in relation to image attribute categories. A total of 592 sessions and 2,445 queries from the Excite Web search engine log data were analyzed by utilizing Batley’s visual information types and two facets and seven sub-facets of query reformulation patterns. The results of this study are organized with two folds: query reformulation and categorical transition. As the most dominant categories of queries are specific and general/nameable, this tendency stays over various search stages. From the perspective of reformulation patterns, while the Parallel movement is the most dominant, there are slight differences depending on initial or preceding query categories. In examining categorical transitions, it was found that 60-80% of search queries were reformulated within the same categories of image attributes. These findings may be applied to practice and implementation of image retrieval systems in terms of assisting users’ query term selection and effective thesauri development.

참고문헌

1

Batley, S.. (1988). Visual information retrieval: Browsing strategies in pictorial database (373-381). Proceedings of 12th International Online Information Meeting.

2

Bruza, P. D.. (1997). Query reformulation on the Internet: empirical data and the hyperindex search engine (-). Proceedings of the 5th RIAO Conference.

3

Chen, H.. (2001). An analysis of image retrieval tasks in the field of art history. Information Processing & Management, 37(5), 701-720.

4

Choi, Y.. (2003). Searching for images: The analysis of users’ queries for image retrieval in American history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 498-511.

5

Chung, E.. (2009). Categorical and specificity differences between user-supplied tags and search query terms for images. An analysis of Flickr tags and Web image search queries. Information Research, 14(3), -.

6

Collins, K.. (1998). Providing subject access to images: A study of user queries. The American Archivist, 61, 36-55.

7

Eakins, J.. (1999). Content-Based Image Retrieval: a Report to the JISC Technology Applications Program. Institute for Image Data Research, University of Northuinbria at Newcastle.

8

Eastman, C.. (2003). Coverage, relevance, and ranking: the impact of query operators on Web search engine results. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(4), 383-411.

9

Efthimiadis, E. N.. (1996). Query expansion. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology, 31, 121-187.

10

Enser, P. G. B.. (1992). Analysis of Visual Information Retrieval Queries. British Library.

11

Enser, P. G. B.. (2007). Facing the reality of semantic image retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 63(4), 465-481.

12

Goodrum, A.. (2003). A state transition analysis of image search patterns on the Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2728, 281-290.

13

Goodrum, A.. (2001). Image searching on the Excite Web search engine. Information Processing & Management, 37, 295-311.

14

Griesdorf, H.. (2002). Modeling what users see when they look at images: a cognitive view point. Journal of Documentation, 58(1), 1-24.

15

Hastings, S. K.. (1995). Query categories in a study of intellectual access to digitized art images (3-8). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science.

16

Jansen, B. J.. (2005). How are we searching the World Wide Web?: an analysis of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263.

17

Jörgensen, C.. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2), 161-174.

18

Jörgensen, C.. (2003). Image Retrieval: Theory and Research:Scarecrow.

19

Jörgensen, C.. (2005). Image querying by image professionals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1346-1359.

20

Keister, L. A.. (1994). User types and queries: Impact on image access systems. in: Challenges in Indexing Electronic Text and Images.

21

Laine-Hernandez, M.. (2006). Image semantics in the description and categorization of journalistic photographs (1-25). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

22

Lau, T.. (1999). Patterns of search: Analyzing and modeling Web query refinement (119-128). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modelling.

23

Manning, C. D.. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval:Cambridge University Press.

24

Marchionini, G.. (2005). Information Seeking in Electronic Environments:Cambridge university press.

25

O’Connor, B.. (1999). User reactions as access mechanism: An exploration based on captions for images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 681-697.

26

Ornager, S.. (1997). Image retrieval: Theoretical analysis and empirical user studies on accessing information in images (202-211). Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science.

27

Rieh, S. Y.. (2006). Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The interactive information retrieval context. Information Processing & Management, 42, 751-768.

28

Rorissa, A.. (2004). Free sorting of images: Attributes used for categorization (360-366). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

29

Shatford, L.. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach. Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly, 6(3), 39-62.

30

Spink, A.. (2002). From E-sex to E-commerce: Web search changes. IEEE Computer, 35(3), 133-135.

31

Sutcliffe, A. G.. (2000). Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(13), 1211-1231.

32

Vakkari, P.. (2003). Changes in search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Information Processing & Management, 39, 445-463.

33

Yoon, J.. (2009). Towards a user-oriented thesaurus for non-domain-specific image collections. Information Processing & Management, 45(4), 452-468.

정보관리학회지