바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

도서관 2.0 시대의 사서 2.0에게 기대되는 역할에 관한 연구

The Expected Role of Librarian 2.0 in the Library 2.0 Era

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.2, pp.201-216
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.201
신수연 (University of Pittsburgh)
김성민 (University of Pittsburgh)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The idea of Library 2.0 originated from the concept of Web 2.0 social interactions within the Web. From this aspect, Library 2.0 is a library blended with Web 2.0. The most remarkable features of Library 2.0 are interactions and user involvement. Users' roles in new library environments are greater since they can contribute to establishing a library collection by annotating, blogging, reviewing, etc. While users’ roles become important, the responsibilities of the librarians increase due to the unfiltered information created by users. Librarians now should extend their roles as information creators, organizers, providers, managers, as well as moderators. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature on the new paradigm of digital libraries, Library 2.0, and the development of Library 2.0. In addition, we discuss the extended role of the Librarian 2.0 in Library 2.0.

참고문헌

1

Abram, S.. (2006). Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the Librarian 2.0: preparing for the 2.0 world. Sirsi/Dynix OneSource, 2(1), -.

2

Agosti, M.. (2004). Annotations in digital libraries and collaboratories - facets, models and usage (-). Proceeding of 8th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries.

3

Anderson, P.. (2007). What is Web 2.0?: Ideas, technologies and implications for education:JISC Technology and Standards Watch.

4

Bischoff, K.. (2008). Can all tags be used for search? (-). Proceedings of Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’08).

5

Black, E. L.. (2007). Web 2.0 and Library 2.0: What Librarians Need to Know. in: Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's Use:Libraries Unlimited.

6

Biancu, B.. (2006). Library 2.0 meme map - version 2.0. In Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bonaria/113222147/.

7

Casey, M. E.. (2006). Library 2.0 - service for the next-generation library. Library Journal, , -.

8

Courtney, N.. (2007). Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User:Libraries Unlimited.

9

Danbury Library Catalogs. http://cat.danburylibrary.org/.

10

Delicious. http://delicious.com/.

11

Digital Library Federation. (1998). A Working Definition of Digital Library. http://www.diglib.org/about/dldefinition.htm.

12

Flickr. The Library of Congress’ Photostream. http://www.flickr.com/photos/Library_of_Congress.

13

Gapen, D. K.. (1993). The virtual library: Knowledge, society, and the librarian. in: The virtual library: Visions and realities:Meckler.

14

Godwin, P.. (2008). Information Literacy meets Library 2.0:Facet.

15

Habib, M.. (2006). Toward Academic Library 2.0: Development and Application of a Library 2.0 Methodology.

16

Heymann, P.. (2008). Can social bookmarking improve web search? (-). Proceedings of Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM’08).

17

Johnson, K., H. Trabelsi, and T. Tin. (2004). Library support for online learners: eResources, eServi ces and the human factors. In: Theory and practice of online learning:Athaba sca University.

18

Kansas State University Libraries. Blogs and Feeds. http://ksulib.typepad.com/.

19

Kantor, P. B.. (1993). The adaptive library network interface: A historical overview and interim report. Library Hi Tech, 11, 81-92.

20

Kappel, G.. (2006). Web Engineering. (1sted.):Wiley & Sons.

21

King, G.. (1994). The Harvard self-enriching library facilities (SELF) Project (-). Proceedings of Digital Libraries '94 (DL '94).

22

Koenig, M. E. D.. (1990). Linking library users: a culture change in librarianship. American Libraries, 21, 844-849.

23

Kuchi, T.. (2004). Librarians without borders: reaching out to students at a campus center. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 310-317.

24

Lin, X.. (2006). Exploring chracteristics of social classification (-). Proceedings of the 17th ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.

25

Levy, D.. (1995). Going digital: A look at assumptions underlying digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 77-84.

26

LibraryThing for Library. http://www.librarything.com/forlibraries.

27

LibraryThing. Tools. http://www.librarything.com/tools.

28
29

Maness, J.. (2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. Webology, 3(2), -.

30

Marshall, C.. (1997). Annotation: from paper books to the digital library (131-140). Proceedings of the ACM Digital Libraries '97 Conference.

31

Mason, J.. (2000). INFOMINE: Promising directions in virtual library development. First Monday, 5(6), -.

32

Nashville Public Library. Teen Web. http://www.library.nashville.org/teens/teenweb.asp.

33

O’Reilly’s Radar. (2005). Web 2.0: Compact Definition?. http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/10/web-20-compact-definition.html.

34

Renda, M. E.. (2005). A personalized collaborative digital library environment: A model and an application. Information Processing and Management, 41, 5-21.

35

Rethlefsen, M. L.. (2007). Tags Help Make Libraries Del.icio.us: Social bookmarking and tagging boost participation. Library Journal, , -.

36

Secker, J.. (2008). The adventures of LASSIE: Libraries, distance learners and social software. Serials, 21(2), 112-115.

37

Second Life. http://secondlife.com/.

38

Sen, S.. (2007). The quest for quality tags (361-370). Proceedings of Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’07).

39

Springer, M., B. Dulabahn, P. Michel, B. Natanson, D. Reser, D. Woodward, and H. Zinkham. (2008). For the Common Good: The Library of Congress Flickr Pilot Project. http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/flickr_pilot.html.

40

Stephens, K.. (2007). Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the hyperlinked library (253-256). Electronic Journal Forum.

41

Steve Museum Project. http://www.steve.museum/.

42

Syn, S. Y.. (2009). Tags as keywords – comparison of the relative quality of tags and keywords (-). Proceedings of ASIS&T 2009 Annual Meeting.

43

Thunder Bay Public Library. Internet Links. http://www.tbpl.ca/internal.asp?id=283&cid=333.

44

Trant, J.. (2006). Social classification and folksonomy in art museum: Early data from the steve.mseum tagger prototype (-). Proceedings of 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research (ASISTSIG/CR).

45

Wenzler, J.. (2007). LibraryThing and the Library Catalog: Adding Collective Intelligent to the OPAC (-). A Workshop on Next Generation Libraries CARLNorth IT Interest Group.

46

University of Pittsburgh Library System. PittCat+ Beta. http://pittcatplus.pitt.edu/.

47

Upper Hudson Library System. http://aquabrowser.uhls.org/.

48

Yi, K.. (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress Subject Headings: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Documentation, 65(5), 872-900.

49

Zubiaga, A.. (2009). Getting the most out of social annotations for web page classification (-). Proceedings of Document Engineering (DocEng’09).

정보관리학회지