바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

정보학연구의 25년간 동향 분석 : JASIST 논문을 중심으로

Longitudinal Analysis of Information Science Research in JASIST 1985-2009

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.2, pp.129-155
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.2.129
서은경 (한성대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

In recent years, the changes in information technology have been so dramatic and the rate of changes has increased so much that information science research rigorously evolves with the passage of time and proliferates in diverging research directions dynamically. The aims of this study are to provide a global overview of research trends in information science and to trace its changes in the main topics over time. The study examined the topics of research articles published in JASIST between 1985 and 2009 and identified its changes during five 5 year periods. The study found that the most productive area has consistently been ‘Information Retrieval’, followed by ‘Informetrics’, ‘Information Use and Users’, ‘Network and Technology’, and ‘Publishing and Services’. Information retrieval is a predominant core area in Information Science covering computer-based handling of multimedia information, employment of new semantic methods from other disciplines, and mass information handling on virtual environments. Currently Informetric studies shift from finding existing phenomena to seeking valuable descriptive results and researchers of information use have concentrated especially on information-seeking aspects, so adding greater sophistication to the relatively simple approach taken in information retrieval.

참고문헌

1

Bar-Ilan, Judit. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52.

2

Belkin, N.J.. (1978). Information concepts for information science. Journal of Documentation, 34, 55-85.

3

Bensman, S.J.. (2007). Garfield and the Impact Factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93-155.

4

Bjorneborn, L.. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227.

5

Borgman, C.L.. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.

6

Boyce, B.R.. (1985). Principles and theories in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20, 153-178.

7

Buckland, M.. (1999). The landscape of information science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 1970-1974.

8

Buckland, M.. (1995). History of information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 385-413.

9

Case, D.C.. (2007). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior:Emerald.

10

Cleverdon, Cyrill W.. (1991). The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages (3-12). Proceedings of SIGIR. ACM Press.

11

Chu, H.. (2001). Research in image indexing and retrieval as reflected in the literatures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 1011-1018.

12

Ding, Y.. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(2), 67-78.

13

Dervin, B.. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. in: Qualitative Research in Information Management:Libraries Unlimited.

14

Gilchrist, A.. (2009). Information Science in Transition:Facet Publishing.

15

Hawkins, D.T.. (2001). Information Science Abstracts: Tracking the literature of information science. Part 1: definition and map. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(1), 44-53.

16

Hjorland, B.. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462.

17

Hughes, B.. (2006). Reconsidering language identification for written language resources (485-488). International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.

18

Johnson, J.D.. (1996). Information Seeking: An Organizational Dilemma:Quorum Books.

19

Kuhlthau, C.C.. (1988). Developing a model of the library search process: cognitive and affective libraries. Reference Quarterly, 28, 232-242.

20

Kent, A.. (1955). Machine literature searching VIII: Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems. American Documentation, 6(2), 93-101.

21

Klempner, I.M.. (1969). Information science unlimited?. American Documentation, 20, 339-343.

22

Konheim, A.C.. (1981). Cryptography: A Primer:John Wiley & Sons.

23

Manning, C.D.. (2008). Introduction to Information Retreival:Cambridge University Press.

24

Meadows, J.. (2008). Fifty years of UK research in information science. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 403-444.

25

Moed, H.F.. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation:Springer.

26

Mooers, Calvin. (1961). From a point view of mathematical etc. techniques. in: Towards Information Retrieval:Butterworths.

27

Nicholas, D.. (2005). Scholarly journal usages: the results of deep log analysis. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 248-280.

28

Oppenheim, C.. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 297-301.

29

Rayward, W.B.. (1996). The history and historiography of information science: Some reflections. Information Processing and Management, 32(1), 3-17.

30

Salton, G.. (1991). The SMART project in automatic document retrieval (356-358). Proceedings of SIGIR. ACM press.

31

Saracevic, T.. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063.

32

Summers, R.. (1999). Information science in 2010: A Loughborough University view. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1153-1162.

33

Taylor, R.S.. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 13, 391-396.

34

Thelwall, M.. (2009). Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative web Research for the Social Science:Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

35

White, H.D.. (1981). Author Co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.

36

White, H.D.. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.

37

Zhao, D.. (2008). Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916-937.

38

Zins, C.. (2007). Conceptions of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 335-350.

39

Zins, C.. (2007). Knowledge map of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 524-535.

40

Zins, C.. (2007). Classification schemes of information science: Twenty-eight scholars map the field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 645-672.

41

Wilson, T.D.. (2002). The nonsense of knowledge management. Information Research, 8(1), -.

정보관리학회지