바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on the Application of LibraryThing Folksonomy Tags through the Analysis of Elements related with Work

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.1, pp.41-60
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.041


& (2010). A Study on the Application of LibraryThing Folksonomy Tags through the Analysis of Elements related with Work. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 41-60, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.041
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the properties of the tags used in the fiction genre, the structural aspect of the patterns and the contents of the tags by utilizing LibraryThing, where the tags are assigned in work units of FRBR. A comparative analysis was conducted in terms of the level of association between the descriptive terms in bibliography and LCSH terms. The study also examined the sources of the tags not included in the bibliographic descriptions or LCSHs, what aspects of work they represented, and the terms used as tags in relation to the work. By restricting the study to a single genre, a number of tags that reflected the characteristics of fiction (three elements of the fiction which are theme, plot, style and three elements of the fiction composition which are character, event, setting) were extracted. This study finds out the role of the tag making up the taxonomy and proposes a new direction for the tagging system by demonstrating the possibility of using tags as facets in information organization and retrieval.

keywords
folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL, 폭소노미, 태그, 집단지성, 사회적 분류, 사회적 네트워킹, 소설 검색, 정보 조직, folksonomy, tag, tagger, social classification, social indexing, social tagging, social networking, social cataloging, LibraryThing, LibraryThing for Libraries, LTFL

Reference

1.

김성희. (2009). 디지털화 문화유산 태그의 패턴 및 특성 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(3), 171-185.

2.

박민수. (2003). 현대문학의 이해:느티나무.

3.

박철희. (2009). 문학이론입문:형설.

4.

이강표. (2007). 웹2.0 환경에서의 태깅기술 동향. 정보과학회지, 25(10), 36-42.

5.

이성숙. (2008). 대학도서관 폭소노미 태그의 형태적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 463-480.

6.

이성숙. (2009). 국내 도서관 폭소노미 태그의 일반적 패턴 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 20(1), 137-150.

7.

이재윤. (2006). 이용자 생성 메타데이터에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 37(3), 1-24.

8.

이정미. (2007). 폭소노미의 개념적 접근과 웹 정보 서비스에의 적용. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 141-159.

9.

조재인. (2008). 학술정보서비스의 폭소노미 분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(4), 95-112.

10.

ACRLog. http://acrlog.org/2008/03/08/library-thing-for-academic-libraries/.

11.

Angus, E.. (2008). General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review, 32(1), 89-101.

12.

Arch, X.. (2007). Creating the academic library folksonomy: Put social tagging to work at your institution. College & Research Libraries News, 68(2), 80-81.

13.

Blachly, A.. (2006). “Tagging meets subject heading” In Thingology Blog. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2006/05/tagging-meets-subjectheadings.php.

14.

DeZelar-Tiedman, C.. (2008). Doing the Library-ThingTM in an academic library catalog (211-). Proceeding of the International conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.

15.

Golder, S. A.. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208.

16.

Hider, P.. (2009). A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544-560.

17.

Hvass, A.. (2008). Cataloguing with Library-Thing: as easy as 1, 2, 3!. Library Hi Tech News, 25(10), 5-7.

18.

Kipp, M.. (2006). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1-18.

19.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.com/addbooks/. http://www.librarything.com/addbooks/.

20.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.com/groups/combiners. http://www.librarything.com/groups/combiners.

21.

LibraryThing. http://www.librarything.es/concepts#works/thingology. http://www.librarything.es/concepts#works/thingology.

22.

LibraryThing Blog. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2009/01/librarything-and-cigthe-deal.php/. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2009/01/librarything-and-cigthe-deal.php/.

23.

LibraryThing Blog. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2007/07/tagmash.php. http://www.librarything.com/blog/2007/07/tagmash.php.

24.

LibraryThing Thingology Blog. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2007/07/tagmash-book-tagginggrows-up.php. http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2007/07/tagmash-book-tagginggrows-up.php.

25.

LibraryThing's Wiki. http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Tagging. http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Tagging.

26.

Mathes, A.. (2004). “Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata." in Computer Mediated Communication. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.

27.

Mendes, L. H.. (2009). Subjecting the catalog to tagging. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 30-41.

28.

Morrison, P. J.. (2007). Why are they tagging, and why do we want them to?. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 12-15.

29.

Neal, D.. (2007). Folksonomies and image tagging: Seeing the future?. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 7-11.

30.

Noruzi, A.. (2006). Folksonomies:(Un) Controlled Vocabulary? Alireza Noruzi. Knowledge Organization, 33(4), 199-203.

31.

Noruzi, A.. (2007). “Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary?" in Webology. http://www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/editorial12.html.

32.

Pera, Maria S.. (2009). A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1392-1406.

33.

Personal InfoCloud. http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2005/02/explaining_and_.html.

34.

Ritchie, A.. (2009). LibraryThing: An interview with Tim spalding. Crossroads, 15(4), 2-.

35.

Schwartz, C.. (2008). Thesauri and facets and tags, oh my! A look at three decades in subject analysis. Library Trends, 56(4), 830-842.

36.

Smith, G.. (2004). “Folksonomy: Social classification." in Atomiq. http://atomiq.org/archives/2004/08/folksonomy_social_classification.html.

37.

Smith, G.. (2008). Tagging: Powered metadata for the social web:New Riders.

38.

Steele, T.. (2009). The new cooperative cataloging. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 68-77.

39.

Tennis, J. T.. (2006). Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (-). Proceedings 17th SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop.

40.

Vander Wal, T.. (2005). Folksonomy definition and Wikipedia. http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1750.

41.

Weber, J.. “Folksonomy and controlled vocabulary in LibraryThing." In Jonathan Weber Bolg. http://jonathanweber.info/samples/2452-Folksonomy.pdf.

42.

Wenzler, J.. (2007). LibraryThing and the library catalog: Adding collective intelligence to the OPAC (-). a workshop on next generation libraries CARL NITIG.

43.

Westcott, J.. (2009). LibraryThing for libraries at Claremont. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 78-81.

44.

Zollers, A.. (2007). Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance, and activism (-). WWW 2007.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy