바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Features of the Next Generation Search Services

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.4, pp.93-112
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.4.093


& (2009). A Study on the Features of the Next Generation Search Services. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(4), 93-112, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.4.093
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Recently in the area of the information environment, there are lively discussions about search 2.0 which is representative of the next generation search services. In this study, we divide information search model into matching and linking models according the developmental stages. Therefore, on the one hand, we analyze the background, main concepts, related attributes and cases of the next generation search services and the other, we identify the representative keywords by the group analysis of various attributes and cases of it. The result shows that the main keywords such as social search, artificial intelligence and semantic search, and relation/network based search are representative of the search 2.0.

keywords
next generation search services, search 2.0, social search, artificial intelligence and semantic search, relation/network based search, 차세대 검색서비스, 검색 2.0, 소셜 검색, 지능형 의미 검색, 관계기반 검색, next generation search services, search 2.0, social search, artificial intelligence and semantic search, relation/network based search

Reference

1.

김용학. (2003). 사회 연결망 분석:박영사.

2.

노상규. (2007). 인터넷 진화의 열쇠 온톨로지 웹 2.0에서 3.0으로:가즈토이.

3.

노지현. (2007). 한국의 도서관 환경에서 FRBR 모델의 의미. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(2), 223-244.

4.

노지현. FRBR과 차세대 목록.

5.

박영진. (2006). 웹 2.0과 정보검색. ꡔ정보통신연구진흥원 주간기술동향. http://comin.itfind.or.kr/itcomp/getFile.htm?identifier=02-001-070601-013904&classCode=undefined.

6.

서은경. (2006). FRBR 모형에 기반 한 서지정보 인터페이스 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 317-339.

7.

송종철. (2001). 특허 및 기술정보의 연계 검색에 관한 연구. 전자통신분석, 16(15), 143-150.

8.

윤영수. 복잡계 개론.

9.

이경일. (2008). 검색의 혁명 검색 2.0. http://saltlux.egloos.com/849821.

10.

이수상. (2006). 디지털도서관의 통합검색 방식에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 37(2), 127-144.

11.

이순영. (2007). 지역기반 도서관 포털 구축의 요건에 관한 연구.

12.

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

13.

이충무. (2009). 추천시스템과 소셜 네트워크를 융합한 지능형 연구자연결망 구축. 정보관리연구, 40(1), 199-215.

14.

장정훈. (2007). 네이버 스토리:NEWRUN.

15.

정영미. (2005). 정보검색연구:구미무역.

16.

Bakkalbasi, Nisa. Patterns of research collaboration in a digital library for Economics (1-15). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

17.

Ezzy, Ebrahim. Search 2.0 vs Traditional Search. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/search_20_vs_tr.php.

18.

Kirchhoff, Lars. (2008). Using social network analysis to enhance information retrieval systems. http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/Publikationen/46444.

19.

Merelo, Juan J. Who is the best connected EC researcher? Centrality analysis of the complex network of authors in evolutionary computation. <http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0708/0708.2021v1.pdf.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy