바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on Social Capital of Strategy Alignment to IT Govenance in Digital Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.3, pp.295-316
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.295


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This research applied the concepts of IT architecture and IT governance for managing with an integrated computing environment and organized structure, which base a digital library’s management and operation. It also aims to analyze the structural system between information technology of human resources and strategy alignment elements of business, which both constitute the core content. Social network analysis software was used to investigate the complicated relationship between IT and business-related strategy alignment elements. The following is the results of carrying out this research on the social network structure and features of strategy alignment elements for a digital library. First, analysis indexes for strategy alignment elements and social network of a digital library were developed. Second, an analysis model was designed based on the analysis index for social network as to strategy alignment elements. Analysis model was appraised by collecting social network datasets for such strategy alignment elements as Communications, Competency and Value, Governance, Partnership, Scope and Architecture, and Skills against the Business strategy, Information strategy, Business and Technology of a digital library. As for the content of analysis, social network structure and specific features were analyzed in relation to a digital library’s (1) General social network, (2) Structure of strategy alignment elements, (3) Strategy fit and Functional integration.

keywords
digital library management, IT governance, strategy alignment, socal network analysis, social capital, 디지털도서관 통합관리, 정보기술 거버넌스, 전략적 연계, 사회연결망 분석, 사회적 자본, digital library management, IT governance, strategy alignment, socal network analysis, social capital

Reference

1.

강창덕. (2005). 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅에서의 컨텍스트 적응형 개인화 서비스를 위한 사용자 모델 (544-546). 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집. 한국정보과학회.

2.

김윤정. (2006). 정보기술아키텍처 프레임워크에 관한 연구. 한국콘텐츠학회, 4(2), 689-692.

3.

김용학. (2007). 사회연결망 이론:박영사.

4.

구중억. (2007). SOA 기반 웹서비스의 Library 2.0 적용방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(3), 297-320.

5.

노동조. (2004). 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅에 기반한 유비쿼터스 도서관의 과제와 전망에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 15(2), 219-240.

6.

문경화. (2001). 이용자 중심의 내용관리(Content Management) 요소에 관한 연구.

7.

손동원. (2002). 사회 네트워크 분석:경문사.

8.

송재구. (2006). 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅 정보관리를 위한 컨텍스트 기반의 데이터 모델링. 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 6(3), 55-62.

9.

장선희. (2006). 정보시각화를 위한 사회연결망 분석의 개념요소에 관한 연구 (126-127). 한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집. 한국디자인학회.

10.

정미경. (2007). 도서관 통합서비스 모델로서의 Information Commons에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4), 347-363.

11.

정보사회진흥원. 범정부 ITA 산출물 메타모델 정의서.

12.

정준민. (2004). 정보의 유비쿼터스적 해석을 통한 도서관 본질에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 21(4), 265-280.

13.

Albert, R. (1999). Diameter of the World Wide Web. Nature, 401(6749), 130-131.

14.

Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital Libraries:Mit Press.

15.

Bernard, S. (2004). An Introduction to Enter- prise Architecture. Author House, 1, 38-42.

16.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education:Greenwood Press.

17.

Broadbent, M. (1997). How Business and IT Managers can Create IT Infrastructures. Sloan. Management Review, 38, 77-92.

18.

Burn, J. M. (2000). A Com- parison of the Views of Business and IT Management on Success Factors for Strategic Alignment. Information & Management, 37(4), 197-216.

19.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structual Holes: The Social Structure of Competition:Harvard University Press.

20.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.

21.

Duffy, J. IT/Business Alignment: Is it an Option Or is it Mandatory.

22.

Greenblatt, M. (1982). Social Networks and Mental Health: On Overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(8), 977-984.

23.

Henderson. J. C. (1993). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Infor- mation Technology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4-16.

24.

Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to Social Network Models:Dept. of Sociology, University of California.

25.

ITGI. (2001). Board briefing on IT Goverance. http://www.itgi.org.

26.

Jerry, L. (1999). Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment. California Management Review, 42, 109-122.

27.

Luftman, J. (2001). Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity. Strategic Information Technology: Opportunities for Competitive Advantage, 6, 105-134.

28.

Ministry of International Trade and Industry. (1999). Corporate approaches to IT Govenance. http://www.jipdec.or.jp/chosa/MITIBE/sld001.htm.

29.

Moody, K. W. (2003). New Meaning to IT Alignment. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 30-35.

30.

Smaczny, T. (2001). Is an Alignment between Business and Information Technology the Appropriate Paradigm to Manage IT in Today's Organisations?. Management Decision, 39(10), 797-802.

31.

OMB. Federal Enterprise Architecture Program EA Assessment Framework 2.0.

32.

Peterson,R.R. Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance.

33.

Van Grembergen, W. Introduction to the Minitrack: IT Governance and its Mechanisms.

34.

Wasserman, S. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications:Cambridge University Press.

35.

Zachman, J. (1987). A Framework for Infor- mation System Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management