바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

위키 환경을 활용한 학습자의 협력학습 기반 그룹 프로젝트 활동 분석: 구글 사이트 활용 사례를 중심으로

Analyzing Learners' Activities in the Collaborative Learning Based Group Project Using the Wiki Environment: a Case of the Google Sites Use

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.3, pp.239-259
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.239
정영숙 (한국방송통신대학교)
박옥남 (성균관대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구에서는 교육 도구로써 위키의 가능성을 탐색하기 위해서, 위키 환경인 구글 사이트에서 협력학습 기반 그룹 프로젝트를 수행하는 학습자들의 행태와 인식을 조사하였다. 이를 위해 파일 업로드, 웹 페이지 사용, 댓글, 네비게이션 바와 관련된 개별 학습자 및 그룹별 형태 분석과 구글 사이트 사용에 대한 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과를 토대로 구글 사이트를 활용한 학습자들의 협력학습 기반 그룹 프로젝트 활동의 특징을 논의하였다. 또한 협력학습의 교육적 효과성과 학습활동 진행 과정 평가의 용이성을 증대시키기 위하여 위키 환경 시스템이 어떻게 개선되어야 하는지를 제시하였다.

Abstract

The study aims at investigating students' behaviors and perceptions regarding the collaborative learning based group project using the wiki environment. The study utilized Google Sites as a case, and analyzed file unloads, the use of web pages, navigation bars, and comments as well as surveys. The study discusses main characteristics of students' activities in the collaborative learning group project, which are drawn from the analysis of students' behaviors and perceptions. The study also provides implications for improvement of wiki environment to support collaborative learning in education.

참고문헌

1

김동식. (2008). 위키기반 협력학습 환경에서 지식 외현화를 지원하는 의미협상 도구의 개발 및 효과 분석. 교육정보미디어연구, 14(4), 53-83.

2

김혜원. (2008). 과제의 구조화 정도에 따른 위키 활용 학습의 효과 탐색에 관한 연구. 교육공학연구, 24(3), 1-21.

3

한희섭. (2006). Wiki 기반 협력학습에서 적응적 내비게이션 시스템이 그룹 활동에 미치는 효과. 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 9(1), 41-48.

4

Abbitt, J. (2009). Evaluating the implementation of a social bookmarking activity for an undergraduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(1), 83-101.

5

Ajjan, H. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71-80.

6

Alexander, B. (2006). A new wave of inno- vation for teaching and learning. Educause Review, 41(2), 32-44.

7

Barkley, E. F. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: a handbook for college faculty:Jossey-Bass.

8

Boulos, M. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2-23.

9

Breeding, M. (2006). Web 2.0? Let's get to Web 1.0 first. Computers in Libraries, 26(5), 30-33.

10

Bruce, H. (2004). Information Behaviour that Keeps Found Things Found. http://information.net/ir/10-1/paper207.html.

11

Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52, 141-146.

12

Collis, B. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93-106.

13

Coutinho, C. (2008). Using social bookmarking to enhance cooperation/ collaboration in a teacher education program (-). In Proceedings of World Conference on Educaitonal Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008. AACE.

14

Cress, U. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 105-122.

15

Elgort, I. (2008). Is wiki as effective platform for group course work?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195-210.

16

Ewing, J. (2002). A framework for evaluating computer supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 112-118.

17

Gooding, J. (2008). International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 4(2), 44-53.

18

Gordon-Murnane, L. (2006). Social bookmar- king, folksonomies, and Web 2.0 tools. Searcher, 14(6), 26-38.

19

Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens online ed- ucation as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41-61.

20

Harris, C. (2009). The next big thing - What's next for social bookmarking?. School Library Journal, 55(2), 32-37.

21

Hong, H. (2008). The analysis of leaners and teachers for University 2.0 as learning tools. Educational Technology Research, 24(4), 1-26.

22

Jefferies, P. (2003). ICT in supporting collabora- tive learning: pedagogy and practice. Journal of Educational Media, 28(1), 35-48.

23

Kearsley, G. (1998). Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-23.

24

Krause, B. A comparison of social bookmarking with traditional search.

25

Kroski, E. (2006). The Hype and the Hullabaloo of Web 2.0. http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/1=01/13/the-hype-and-the-hullaballo-of-web-20/.

26

Lancaster, F. W. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice.

27

Leuf, B. (2001). The Wiki Way: Quick collaboration on the Web:Addison-Wesley Longmann.

28

Miles, MB. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis:Sage Publications.

29

Millen, D. (2007). Social bookmarking and explo- ratory search (21-40). Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.

30

Morrison, J. (2008). Tagging and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness of folk- sonomies on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1562-1579.

31

Porter, J. (2008). Designing for the social web:New Riders.

32

Raman, M. (2005). Designing knowledge management systems for teaching and learning with wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 3111-3320.

33

Rollett, H. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87-107.

34

Rosen, D. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25, 211-225.

35

Tonkin, E. (2005). Making the case for a wiki. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue42/tonkin/.

36

Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43-55.

정보관리학회지