바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

박물관메타데이터 표준프레임워크 CIMI가 남긴 유산과 영향력

Legacy and Impacts of the Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI)

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.2, pp.83-103
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.2.083
Robbie A. Marshall (Texas Woman's University)
이혁진 (Texas Woman’s University)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), operating from 1990-2003, was charged with creating and introducing the international museum community to the concept of adopting metadata industry standards. The CIMI consortium exceeded its original mission by; creating a standards framework, profile, testbeds, important metadata publications, free downloadable metadata software and protocols, and providing instrumental guidance and support in development of new projects. However, CIMI’s emphasis on the importance and utility of a standards-based approach and the necessity for implementing the CIMI Standards Framework is probably its most important achievement. During CIMI’s tenure, museums reaped the benefits by learning how to apply the model and standards to meet their individual needs while not having to invent new ones or bear the cost of software development. Although CIMI operations ceased in 2003, its impacts on museum related metadata application and research were unprecedented in that it provided the standards prototype and foundations on which to build. This paper discusses what CIMI bequeathed to the next generation of museum metadata field developers and describes the anticipated realm of future projects and advancement.

참고문헌

1

Archives and Museum Informatics. (2008). The Meta Art Museum: Towards the Promise of an Open Collaboration Platform. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/fleming/fleming.html.

2

Bearman, D. (1993). CIMI Consortium for the Computer Interchange of Museum Information. Museum Computer Network. http://www.cni.org/pub/CIMI/.

3

Burnard, L. (1996). Three SGML metadata formats: TEI, EAD, and CIMI. A Study for BIBLINK Work Package. http://www.ifla.org/documents/libraries/cataloging/metadata/biblink2.pdf.

4

Collections Trust. (2008). Spectrum XLM Schema. http://www.mda.org.uk/schema.

5

(1999). Guide to Best Practice: Dublin Core (DC 1.0 = RFC 2413). http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~cookproj/project/guide/CIMI_bestprac.PDF.

6

(2002). Consortium for Inter- change of Museum Information (CIMI). http://xml.coverpages.org/cimi.html.

7

Drenth, B. D. (2000). It’s Distributed Searching, Jim. http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zig/meetings/leuven/presentations/bert.ppt.

8

Dunn, H. (2000). Collection Level Description - the Museum Perspective. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september00/dunn/09dunn.html.

9

Gay, G. (2005). CIMI Handscape Project Final Report. http://www.hci.cornell.edu/projects/pdfs%20of%20pubs/handscape.pdf.

10

Grant, A. (2002). CIMI XML Schema for SPECTRUM: Supporting Documentation of version 1.5. http://xml.coverpages.org/CIMI-SupportingDoc15.pdf.

11

Harvard University Library. (2008). VIA Metadata Standards Development: VIA & OLIVIA: Office for Information Systems. http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/systems/olivia_via/via_standards.html.

12

Lagoze, C. (2001). The ABC ontology and model. Journal of Digital Information, 2(2), -.

13

Lewis, E. (2004). Recommendations for Metadata Standards for 3D Images on the Web (-). IS&T's 2004 Archiving Conference.

14

Metropolitan Museum of Art. Metropolitan Museum of Art. http://www.metmuseum.org/Works_Of_Art/index.asp.

15

Michard, A. (1998). The Aquarelle Resource Discovery System. http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/Aquarelle_Ressource/html/comnetv2.html.

16

Miller, P. (2000). Towards the intelligent museum. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue25/cimi/.

17

Moen, W. E. (1996). The CIMI Profile: Z39.50 Application Profile Specifications for Use in Project CHIO Draft Version 3. http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/profiles/cimi2.html#Attribute.

18

Moen, W. E. (1998). Accessing Distributed Cultural Heritage Information. Communications of the ACM, 41(4), 45-48.

19

Moen, W. E. (1998). CIMI's Z39.50 Interoperability Testbed: Search and Retrieval of Distributed Cultural Heritage Information. http://www.unt.edu/wmoen/publications/CIMI_ACMrev.htm.

20

OKI. (2009). Open Knowledge Initiative. http://www.okiproject.org/.

21

Patel, M. (2005). Metadata requirements for digital museum environments. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(3), 179-192.

22

Perkins, J. (2001). A New Way of Making Cultural Information Resources Visible on the Web: Museums and the Open Archive Initiative (15-17). 5th Museums and the Web 2001: Selected Papers from an International Conference.

23

Smiraglia, R. P. (2005). Content Metadata--An A- nalysis of Etruscan Artifacts in a Museum of Archeology. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 40(3), 135-151.

24

Spinazze, A. (2001). CIMI Consortium--the organization of museum intelligence [Consortium for the Interchange of Museum Information]. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, 30(1), 5-7.

25

Thomas, J. (1999). Meaning and Metadata: Managing Information in a Visual Resource Reference Collection. http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/ach-allc.99/proceedings/thomas.html.

26

UKOLN Metadata Group. (1998). Computer Inter- change of Museum information (CIMI). http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_04.htm.

정보관리학회지