바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Content and Methodology of Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.1, pp.351-370
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.351

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply the evidence-based library and information practice(EBLIP) in Korean librarianship with analysis of concepts and research method on EBLIP. EBLIP seeks to improve library practice by utilising the best available evidence in conjunction with a pragmatic perspective developed from working experiences in librarianship. The EBLIP focused on the medicine library, however, it is spread to academic, special, school library. EBLIP process can be described through its five stage: formulate a question, find evidence, critically appraise the evidence, apply results of appraisal, evaluate change, redefine problem. It provides a standardized methodology of systematic review, which is a best evidence in EBLIP and is a new mixed research method.

keywords
evidence-based practice, evidence-based library and information practice, systematic review, research method, evidence-based practice, evidence-based library and information practice, systematic review, research method, 근거중심실무, 근거중심 문헌정보실무, 비평적 리뷰, 연구방법

Reference

1.

국립국어원 표준대사전. 국립국어원 표준대사전. http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsp.

2.

김명수. (2007). 증거에 기초한 정책결정과 증거를 산출하는 평가에 관한 연구. 감사원 평가연구원.

3.

박명화. (2006). 근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용:군자출판사.

4.

장혜란. (1993). 문헌정보학에 있어서의 실험적 연구방법. 한국문헌정보학회지, 25, 325-341.

5.

Booth, Andrew. (2002). Mirage or reality?. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19, 56-68.

6.

Booth, Andrew. (2003). Bridging the research- practice gap? the role of evidence based librarianship. The New Review of Information and Library Research, 9(1), 3-23.

7.

Booth, Andrew. (2004). Appraising the evidence in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

8.

Brice, Anne. (2004). A brief history of evidence-based practice in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

9.

Campbell Collaboration. Method Policy Briefs. http:// www.campbellcollaboration.org/resources/methods_policy_briefs.php.

10.

Crumley, Ellen. (2002). Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19, 61-70.

11.

Davies, Philip. (1999). What is evidence-based education?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121.

12.

Davies, Philip. (2004). Is evidence-based government possible? (-). The 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium.

13.

Eldredge, Johathan. (2000). Evidence-based librarianship: an overview. Bulletin of Medicine Association, 88(4), 289-302.

14.

Eldredge, Johathan. (2002). Evidence-based librarianship: what might we expect in the years ahead?. Health Information Libraries Journal, 19(2), 71-77.

15.

Eldredge, Johathan. (2006). Evidence-based librarianship: the EBL process. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 341-354.

16.

Fleischman, Steve. (2006). Moving to Evidence-Based Professional Practice. Educational Leadership, , 87-89.

17.

Glynn, Lindsay. Editorial: Defending evidence-based practice in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP.

18.

Haddow, Gaby. (2004). Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap. Library and Information Science Research, 26(1), 29-43.

19.

Jadad, Alejandro R. (1998). Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152, 700-704.

20.

Khan, Khalid S. (2003). Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research:The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.

21.

Koufogiannakis, Denise. (2004). Applying evidence to your everyday practice in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

22.

McKkibon, K. Ann. (1998). Evidence-based practice. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(3), 396-401.

23.

Mullen, Edward J. (2006). The evidence for and against evidence-based practice In Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice:Oxford University Press.

24.

Nye, Chad. Approaches to Parent Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Age Children. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/review_list/index.php?page=1.

25.

Pickard, Alison Jane. (2007). Research Methods in Information:Facet Publishing.

26.

Powell, Ronald R. (2004). Basic Research Methods for Librarians:Libraries Unlimited.

27.

Powell, Ronald R. (2002). Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 49-72.

28.

Roberts, Albert R. (2006). Bridging Evi- dence-Based Health Care and social work: how to search for, develop, and use evidence-based studies in Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice:Oxford University Press.

29.

The American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage Dictionary. http://www.bartleby.com/61/48/E0254800.html.

30.

The Campbell Collaboration. The Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org.

31.

The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Collaboration. , -.

32.

The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.askoxford.com/dictionaries/?view=uk.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management