바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073

근거중심 문헌정보실무의 내용과 방법론에 관한 연구

A Study on the Content and Methodology of Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice

정보관리학회지, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.1, pp.351-370
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.351
표순희 (이화여자대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 개념과 연구방법 및 동향을 분석하여 국내 적용가능성을 살펴보기 위한 기초연구로 수행되었다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무는 실무에서 문제해결과 업무수행 향상을 위해 신뢰성 있는 연구 결과의 활용을 촉진함으로써 연구와 실무 간에 근본적으로 존재하는 격차를 줄이기 위한 운동이다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무는 초기에 의학도서관을 중심으로 수행되었으나 점차로 대학, 전문, 학교도서관으로 확대되었으며 연구 주제 또한 이용자연구, 평가에 한정되었던 것이 경영, 장서, 서비스 등 도서관 서비스 전분야로 확대되고 있다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 수행은 특정한 문제해결을 위한 다양한 연구 결과의 검색, 선정, 평가, 활용의 과정이 이루어진다. 또한 가장 높은 수준의 연구결과인 비평적 리뷰의 생산과정을 정형화함으로써 기존 연구의 체계적인 평가를 수행함과 동시에 새로운 연구통합 방법을 제시하고 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply the evidence-based library and information practice(EBLIP) in Korean librarianship with analysis of concepts and research method on EBLIP. EBLIP seeks to improve library practice by utilising the best available evidence in conjunction with a pragmatic perspective developed from working experiences in librarianship. The EBLIP focused on the medicine library, however, it is spread to academic, special, school library. EBLIP process can be described through its five stage: formulate a question, find evidence, critically appraise the evidence, apply results of appraisal, evaluate change, redefine problem. It provides a standardized methodology of systematic review, which is a best evidence in EBLIP and is a new mixed research method.

참고문헌

1

국립국어원 표준대사전. 국립국어원 표준대사전. http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsp.

2

김명수. (2007). 증거에 기초한 정책결정과 증거를 산출하는 평가에 관한 연구. 감사원 평가연구원.

3

박명화. (2006). 근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용:군자출판사.

4

장혜란. (1993). 문헌정보학에 있어서의 실험적 연구방법. 한국문헌정보학회지, 25, 325-341.

5

Booth, Andrew. (2002). Mirage or reality?. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19, 56-68.

6

Booth, Andrew. (2003). Bridging the research- practice gap? the role of evidence based librarianship. The New Review of Information and Library Research, 9(1), 3-23.

7

Booth, Andrew. (2004). Appraising the evidence in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

8

Brice, Anne. (2004). A brief history of evidence-based practice in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

9

Campbell Collaboration. Method Policy Briefs. http:// www.campbellcollaboration.org/resources/methods_policy_briefs.php.

10

Crumley, Ellen. (2002). Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19, 61-70.

11

Davies, Philip. (1999). What is evidence-based education?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121.

12

Davies, Philip. (2004). Is evidence-based government possible? (-). The 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium.

13

Eldredge, Johathan. (2000). Evidence-based librarianship: an overview. Bulletin of Medicine Association, 88(4), 289-302.

14

Eldredge, Johathan. (2002). Evidence-based librarianship: what might we expect in the years ahead?. Health Information Libraries Journal, 19(2), 71-77.

15

Eldredge, Johathan. (2006). Evidence-based librarianship: the EBL process. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 341-354.

16

Fleischman, Steve. (2006). Moving to Evidence-Based Professional Practice. Educational Leadership, , 87-89.

17

Glynn, Lindsay. Editorial: Defending evidence-based practice in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP.

18

Haddow, Gaby. (2004). Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap. Library and Information Science Research, 26(1), 29-43.

19

Jadad, Alejandro R. (1998). Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152, 700-704.

20

Khan, Khalid S. (2003). Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research:The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.

21

Koufogiannakis, Denise. (2004). Applying evidence to your everyday practice in Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook:Facet Publishing.

22

McKkibon, K. Ann. (1998). Evidence-based practice. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(3), 396-401.

23

Mullen, Edward J. (2006). The evidence for and against evidence-based practice In Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice:Oxford University Press.

24

Nye, Chad. Approaches to Parent Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Age Children. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/review_list/index.php?page=1.

25

Pickard, Alison Jane. (2007). Research Methods in Information:Facet Publishing.

26

Powell, Ronald R. (2004). Basic Research Methods for Librarians:Libraries Unlimited.

27

Powell, Ronald R. (2002). Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 49-72.

28

Roberts, Albert R. (2006). Bridging Evi- dence-Based Health Care and social work: how to search for, develop, and use evidence-based studies in Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice:Oxford University Press.

29

The American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage Dictionary. http://www.bartleby.com/61/48/E0254800.html.

30

The Campbell Collaboration. The Campbell Collaboration. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org.

31

The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Collaboration. , -.

32

The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.askoxford.com/dictionaries/?view=uk.

정보관리학회지