바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Task-Centered Instructional Design for the Library-Based Instruction of Teacher-Librarians

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.347-361
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.347

(2008). A Study on the Task-Centered Instructional Design for the Library-Based Instruction of Teacher-Librarians. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 347-361, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.347
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study is to present cooperative instructional concept framework for the library-based instruction of teacher-librarians, based on ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum and instructional design procedure. The development of cooperative instructional units has been initiated in the school libraries, but the research based on instructional theories, including instructional design, is lacking. In this aspect, instructional theories and methodologies for the cooperative instruction of teacher-librarians are important. The cooperative instructional units for teacher-librarians should be developed by ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum and instructional design procedures. The objectives of the curriculum emphasize information use process based on information task. This study is to present cooperative instructional concept framework, and to help teacher-librarians develop specific cooperative instructional units based on the framework.

keywords
Library-Based Learning(LBL), teacher-librarian, the school library, cooperative instructional concept framework, ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum, information literacy instruction, constructivism learning theory, instructional design, 도서관기반학습, 사서교사, 학교도서관, 협동수업 개념틀, 정보와 도서관 교육과정, 정보이용교육, 구성주의 학습이론, 교수설계, Library-Based Learning(LBL), teacher-librarian, the school library, cooperative instructional concept framework, ‘Information and the Library’ curriculum, information literacy instruction, constructivism learning theory, instructional design

Reference

1.

강인애. (1996). 구성주의 모델들의 특징과 차이점: 인지적 도제 이론, 상황적 학습이론, 인지적 유연성 이론을 중심으로. 교육공학 연구, 12(1), 3-23.

2.

강인애. (1998). 구성주의 교육학:교육과학사.

3.

함명식. (2002). 정보와 도서관 (중학교 교과서):대한교과서.

4.

함명식. (2006). 문헌정보교육학개론:태일사.

5.

AASL & AECT. (1998). Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning:ALA.

6.

Blumenfeld, P. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psych, 26(3), 369-398.

7.

Brown, J. S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

8.

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cogni- tion. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2-10.

9.

Cognition and Technology Group of Vanderbilt. (1992). Technology and the design of generative learning environment:Lawrence Erlbaum Asso- ciates..

10.

Collins, A. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathe- matics, in: Kno- wing, Learning, and Instruction: Essay in Honor of Robert Glaser:Lawrence Erlbaum Asso- ciates.

11.

Dick, W. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction. 4th ed:Harper Collins.

12.

Eisenberg, M. B. (1996). Helping with Home- work:Syracuse University.

13.

Global SchoolNet Foundation. Introduc- tion to project-based learning. http://www.globalschoolhouse.org/web/pbl/pblintro.htm.

14.

Merrill,M.D. (1992). Constructivism and in- structional design, in: Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation:Law- rence Erlbaum Associates.

15.

Perkins,D.N. (1991). Technology meets con- structivism: Do they make a marriage?. Educational Technology, 31(5), 18-23.

16.

Savery, J. R. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Edu- cational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

17.

Spiro, R. J. (1991). Cognitive flexi- bility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advan- ced knowledge acquisition in ill-struc- tured domains, in: Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Con- versation:Law- rence Erlbaum Associates.

18.

Wilson, B. (1991). Cognitive app- renticeships: An instructional design review. AECT Proceedings, , 946-956.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy